Pharmacognosy Journal |Year 2017 | Volume 9 | Issue 4 |Page 504-518
Camille Rabadeaux1, 2, Lou Vallette1, 2, Joseph Sirdaarta1, 3, Craig Davis4, 5, Ian Edwin Cock1,3*
1Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
2School of Biology, Ecole de Biologie Industrielle (EBI), Cergy, FRANCE.
3School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
4Botanical Medicine Research Institute, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
5Bioextracts P/L, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
Ian Edwin Cock
Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
Phone numbers : +61 7 37357637
Fax: +61 7 37355282
Submission Date: 02-12-2016;
Review completed: 05-01-2017;
Accepted Date: 02-02-2017.
DOI : 10.5530/pj.2017.4.82
Article Available online
© 2016 Phcog.Net. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Background: Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss. is a common component of the pharmacopeia’s of multiple African groupings which inhabit the areas in which it grows. Amongst these groups there is a myriad of medicinal uses in the treatment of a wide variety of bacterial, fungal and protozoal infections, as well as in the treatment of cancers. This study was undertaken to test K. senegalensis bark extracts for the ability to inhibit microbial and cancer cell growth, and thus to validate traditional African medicinal usage of this plant in treating a variety of diseases. Materials and Methods: K. senegalensis bark powder was extracted by both solvent maceration and subcritical fluid extraction (SFE). The extracts were tested for the ability to inhibit bacterial and G. duodenalis growth. Inhibition of Caco-2 and HeLa cancer cells was evaluated using MTS-based colorimetric cell proliferation assays. Toxicity was evaluated using an Artemia franciscana nauplii bioassay and GC-MS headspace analysis was used to identify phytochemical components. Results: K. senegalensis bark extracts displayed strong inhibitory activity against bacterial triggers of several autoimmune inflammatory diseases. The growth inhibitory activity of the methanolic and subcritical extracts was particularly noteworthy against P. mirabilis (MIC values of 185 and 211µg/mL, respectively against the reference strains). These extracts were similarly potent growth inhibitors of K. pneumoniae and A. baylyi, and were moderate inhibitors (MIC >1000µg/mL) of P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes growth. The methanolic and subcritical K. senegalensis extracts were also potent inhibitors of G. duodenalis (187 and 328µg/mL, respectively), as well as Caco-2 (268 and 470µg/mL, respectively) and HeLa carcinomas (155 and 174µg/mL, respectively). GC-MS analysis of the SFE extract revealed relative abundances of a variety of mono- and sesquiterpenoids. Furthermore, all K. senegalensis bark extracts were non-toxic in the Artemia franciscana toxicity assay, indicating their safety for therapeutic use. Conclusion: These studies validate traditional African therapeutic usage of K. senegalensis in the treatment of microbial infections, autoimmune inflammatory diseases and some cancers.
Key words: African mahogany, Meliaceae, Sub-critical fluid extraction, Anti bacterial activity, Giardia duodenalis, Anti-proliferative activity, Anti-cancer activity, Terpenoid.
Plants have been used for thousands of years as medicines for treating a variety of different diseases and medical complaints by most, if not all, civilisations. The traditional uses and therapeutic properties of many African plants have been well documented.1,2 For many African plant medicines, the traditional uses have been validated via bioactivity and phytochemical studies. Several African plant-derived medicines have also found a place in allopathic medicine. For example, the anti-tumour agents vinblastine and vincristine (derived from Catharanthus roseus) are used in the treatment of a variety of tumours.1 The medicinal properties of other African plant species are less well understood despite a long history of ethnobotanical usage. Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A.Juss. (family Meliaceae; commonly known as African mahogany, Gambia mahogany, Senegal mahogany, Khaya wood) is a tall evergreen African tree with a wide geographical range, occurring from Central Africa to Western Africa.3 It is native to Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sudan, South Sedan, Togo and Uganda, usually growing in high rainfall woodlands and alongside rivers.
The therapeutic value of K. senegalensis is recognised by multiple ethnic groupings across the regions in which it occurs for the treatment of a wide range of diseases/conditions (Table 1). Whilst the stem bark is most often cited as having therapeutic properties, multiple parts of the K. senegalensis tree have been used in traditional healing systems. Decoctions prepared from the stem bark were used to treat dermatitis and other skin diseases, diarrhoea and dysentery, fever, jaundice, malaria and sexually-transmitted diseases.4,5 Bark decoctions are also useful as an anti-helminth, particularly in treating hookworm and tapeworm infestations.4,5
Despite, the widespread therapeutic usage of K. senegalensis, there have been limited rigorous scientific studies to verify the ethnomedicinal properties of this plant. Instead, many studies have examined the phytochemistry without linking the components to bioactivity studies. Whilst several studies verifying bioactivities associated with ethnobotanical usage exist, many of these reports have focussed on the bark, and to a lesser extent, the leaf. Bark extracts have been reported to have good anticancer6,13,14 and anti-inflammatory properties6 are good immunostimulants11 and are insect deterrents.8 K. senegalensis bark extracts have potential in the treatment of diabetes and have been reported to have anti-hyperglycemic activity comparable to glibenclamide.12 Furthermore, K. senegalensis stem bark extracts have been shown to have high antioxidant content,6 further indicating the therapeutic potential of this species.
Several studies have also examined the antimicrobial properties of K. senegalensis. The anti-protozoal properties have been particularly well established. Solvent extracts of several plant parts have been reported to inhibit the growth of Plasmodium falciparum,15 Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma brucei16 and several Leishmania spp.11 Interestingly, we were unable to find any studies examining the effects of K. senegalensis extracts on the gastrointestinal protozoal parasite Giardia duodenalis. Several studies have also reported bacterial growth inhibitory properties for K. senegalensis extracts.9,10 Both leaf and bark extracts inhibited the growth of the gram positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus faecalis but were ineffective against the gram negative bacteria, Escherichia coli.9 However, the MIC values reported in that study (4000-8000µg/mL) are indicative of only low to moderate growth inhibitory activity. A different study reported antibacterial activity against a broader bacterial panel, although that study only tested a single extract concentration and did not report MIC values, making it impossible to compare the efficacy with other studies.10
Whilst further studies are required to fully characterise the phytochemistry of K. senegalensis, a number of interesting compounds have already been identified. The bark,17,18 leaves19 and fruit8 contain significant quantities of a variety of limonoids (Figure 1a). The bark also contains substantial levels of khayanolides (Figure 1b)20,21 and senagalene triterpenoids (Figure 1d)20 Angolensates have also been reported in the fruit.8 Furthermore, the dimeric proanthocyanidins proanthocyanidin B3 (Figure 1e) and fisetinidol-(4α, 6)-catechin (Figure 1f) were detected in K. senegalensis extracts [Kayser and Abreu, 2001], although that report does not state which part of the plant was investigated. Several similar compounds of these classes have been reported to have antimicrobial and anticancer therapeutic bioactivities.22
Despite the promising earlier studies, there has been a relative lack of recent reports into the therapeutic properties of this species. Furthermore, we were unable to find any previous studies examining the therapeutic properties and phytochemistry of K. senegalensis bark. The current study was undertaken to extend the earlier antibacterial studies of K. senegalensis by examining the growth inhibitory properties of bark extracts against a panel of bacterial triggers of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. The ability to inhibit the growth of the gastrointestinal parasite Giardia duodenalis was also evaluated for the first time. Furthermore, the anticancer activity of K. senegalensis bark extracts was evaluated against 2 cancer cell lines, extending earlier reports of anticancer activity for K. senegalensis extracts. The toxicity of the K. senegalensis bark extracts was also determined to evaluate their usefulness as medicinal agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory scale extraction
K. senegalensis bark was obtained from African Mahogany [Australia] Pty Ltd and stored at −30°C until processing. The shavings were thawed at room temperature, cut into small pieces and thoroughly dried in a Sunbeam food dehydrator. The dried pieces were subsequently ground into a coarse powder and extracted by standardised methods.23 Briefly, an amount of 1g of powdered plant material was weighed into each of five tubes and five different extracts were prepared by adding 50mL of methanol, water, ethyl acetate, chloroform or hexane, respectively. All solvents were obtained from Ajax and were AR grade. The ground dried bark shavings were extracted individually in each solvent for 24 hours at 4°C with gentle shaking. The extracts were filtered through filter paper (Whatman No. 54) under vacuum, followed by drying by centrifugal evaporation in an Eppendorf concentrator 5301. The resultant dry extract was weighed and redissolved in 10mL of deionised water.
Sub-critical fluid extraction (SFE) of K. senegalensis with dimethyl ether (DME)
The ground K. senegalensis bark was extracted by subcritical extraction techniques as previously described.24 Briefly, the ground plant material was packed into the biomass chamber of the extraction system. The system was sealed and evacuated before the plant material in the biomass chamber was covered with compressed solvent (dimethyl ether). The compressed gas was cycled repeatedly across the plant material for 20 minutes. Subcritical DME extraction was carried out at room temperature and at a pressure of 500MPa. The solvent was recycled and stored in a solvent reservoir. After the compressed dimethyl ether gas had been removed, the material that had been extracted from the plant biomass was collected in a separate vessel.
Qualitative phytochemical studies
Phytochemical analysis of the K. senegalensis extracts for the presence of saponins, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, phytosteroids, triterpenoids, cardiac glycosides, anthraquinones, tannins and alkaloids was conducted by previously described assays.25-27
All media was supplied by Oxoid Ltd. Australia. Reference strains of Acinitobacter baylyi (ATCC33304), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC31488), Proteus mirabilis (ATCC21721), Proteus vulgaris (ATCC21719) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC39324) were purchased from American Tissue Culture Collection, USA. All other clinical microbial strains were obtained from the School of Natural Sciences teaching laboratory, Griffith University. All stock cultures were subcultured and maintained in nutrient broth at 4°C.
Evaluation of antimicrobial activity
Antimicrobial activity of all plant extracts was determined using a modified disc diffusion method.28-30 Briefly, 100µL of the test bacteria were grown in 10mL of fresh nutrient broth until they reached a count of approximately 108 cells/mL (as determined by direct microscopic determination). One hundred microliters of microbial suspension was subsequently spread onto the agar plates. The extracts were tested using 5mm sterilised filter paper discs. Discs were infused with 10µL of the test sample, allowed to dry and placed onto the inoculated plates. The plates were allowed to stand at 4°C for 2 hours before incubation with the test microbial agents. The plates were then incubated at 30°C for 24 hours and the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured in millimetres. All measurements were to the closest whole millimetre. Each antimicrobial assay was performed in at least triplicate and mean values were determined. Standard discs of ampicillin (10µg) were obtained from Oxoid Ltd., Australia and served as positive controls. Filter discs infused with 10µL of distilled water were used as negative controls.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the K. senegalensis extracts were determined by a modified disc diffusion method.31,32 The plant extracts were diluted in deionised water across a concentration range of 5mg/mL to 0.1mg/mL. Discs were infused with 10µL of the test dilutions, allowed to dry and placed onto inoculated plates. The assay was performed as outlined above and graphs of the zone of inhibition versus concentration were plotted for each extract. Linear regression was used to calculate the MIC values.
Inhibitory bioactivity against Giardia duodenalis trophozoites
The reference Giardia duodenalis trophozoite strain (ATTC203333) used in this study was purchased from American Tissue Culture Collection, USA. G. duodenalis tropozoites were maintained and subcultured anaerobically at 37°C in TYI-S-33 growth media supplemented with 1% bovine bile (Sigma), 10% Serum Supreme (Cambrex Bioproducts) and 200IU/mL penicillin/200µg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen, USA). Confluent mid log phase cultures were passaged every 2 days by chilling the cultures on ice for a minimum of 10 min, followed by vortexing to dislodge the adherent trophozoites from the walls of the culture vessel. Fresh culture media (5mL) was seeded with approximately 1 · 105 trophozoites for each passage.
Evaluation of anti-Giardial activity
Anti-Giardial activity of the K. senegalensis extracts was assessed by direct enumeration of parasite numbers in the presence or absence of extract33,34 For each test, aliquots of the trophozoite suspension (70µL) containing approximately 1 × 105 trophozoites were added to the wells of a 96 well plate. A volume of 30µL of the test extracts or the vehicle solvent or culture media (for the negative controls) was added to individual wells and the plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 8hours in a humidified anaerobic atmosphere. Following the 8h incubation, all tubes were placed on ice for a minimum of 10min, followed by vortexing to dislodge the adherent trophozoites from the walls of the culture vessel. The suspensions were mounted onto a Neubauer haemocytometer (Weber, UK) and the total trophozoites per mL were determined. The anti-proliferative activity of the test extracts was determined and expressed as a % of the untreated control trophozoites per mL.
Determination of IC50 values against Giardial trophozoites
For IC50 determinations, the plant extracts were tested by the direct enumeration method across a range of concentrations. The assays were performed as outlined above and graphs of the zone of inhibition versus concentration were plotted for each extract. Linear regression was used to calculate the IC50 values.
Screen for anti-cancer bioactivity
Cancer cell lines
The Caco-2 and HeLa carcinoma cell lines used in this study were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, USA). The cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Life Technologies), supplemented with 20mM HEPES, 10mM sodium bicarbonate, 50µg/mL streptomycin, 50IU/mL penicillin, 2mM glutamine and 10% foetal calf serum (Life Technologies). The cells were maintained as monolayers in 75mL flasks at 37°C, 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere until approximately 80% confluent.
Evaluation of cancer cell anti-proliferative activity
Evaluation of the anti-proliferative activity of the K. senegalensis extracts was as previously described35,36 Briefly, 1mL of trypsin (Sigma) was added to the culture flasks and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 15min to dislodge the cancer cells. The cell suspensions were then transferred to a 10mL centrifuge tube and sedimented by centrifugation. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were resuspended in 9mL of fresh media. Aliquots of the resuspended cells (70µL, containing approximately 5000 cells) were added to the wells of a 96 well plate. A volume of 30µL of the test extracts or cell media (for the negative control) was added to individual wells and the plates were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 12 hours in a humidified atmosphere. A volume of 20µL of Cell Titre 96 Aqueous One solution (Promega) was subsequently added to each well and the plates were incubated for a further 3hours. Absorbances were recorded at 490nm using a Molecular Devices, Spectra Max M3 plate reader. All tests were performed in at least triplicate and triplicate controls were included on each plate. The anti-proliferative activity of each test was calculated as a percentage of the negative control using the following formula:
Act is the corrected absorbance for the test extract (calculated by subtracting the absorbance of the test extract in media without cells from the extract cell test combination) and Acc is the corrected untreated control (calculated by subtracting the absorbance of the untreated control in media without cells from the untreated cell media combination).
Determination of IC50 values against Caco-2 and HeLa carcinoma cells
For IC50 determinations, the plant extracts were tested by the Cell Titre 96 colourimetric method across a range of concentrations. The assays were performed as outlined above and graphs of the zone of inhibition versus concentration were plotted for each extract. Linear regression was used to calculate the IC50 values.
Reference toxins for biological screening
Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) (AR grade, Chem-Supply, Australia) was prepared as a 2mg/mL solution in distilled water and was serially diluted in synthetic seawater for use in the A. franciscana nauplii bioassay.
Artemia franciscana nauplii toxicity screening
Toxicity was tested using a modified Artemia franciscana nauplii lethality assay. 37-39 Briefly, A. franciscana cysts were obtained from North American Brine Shrimp, LLC, USA (harvested from the Great Salt Lake, Utah). Synthetic seawater was prepared using Reef Salt, AZOO Co., USA. Sea-water solutions at 34g/L distilled water were prepared prior to use. An amount of 1g of A. franciscana cysts were incubated in 500mL synthetic seawater under artificial light at 25°C, 2000 Lux with continuous aeration. Hatching commenced within 16-18h of incubation. Newly hatched A. franciscana (nauplii) were used within 10h of hatching. Nauplii were separated from the shells and remaining cysts and were concentrated to a suitable density by placing an artificial light at one end of their incubation vessel and the nauplii rich water closest to the light was removed for biological assays. The extracts and positive control were also serially diluted in artificial seawater for LC50 determination. A volume of 400µL of seawater containing approximately 52 (mean 51.8, n = 125, SD 11.7) nauplii were added to wells of a 48 well plate and immediately used for bioassay. The plant extracts were diluted to 4mg/mL in seawater for toxicity testing, resulting in a 2mg/mL concentration in the bioassay. Volumes of 400µL of diluted plant extract and the reference toxins were transferred to individual wells and incubated at 25 ± 1°C under artificial light (1000 Lux). A negative control (400µL seawater) was run in at least triplicate for each plate. All treatments were performed in at least triplicate. The wells were checked at regular intervals and the number of dead counted. The nauplii were considered dead if no movement of the appendages was observed within 10 sec. After 48h all nauplii were sacrificed and counted to determine the total number per well. The LC50 with 95% confidence limits for each treatment was calculated using probit analysis.
Non-targeted GC-MS head space analysis
Separation and quantification of phytochemical components were performed using a Shimadzu GC-2010 plus (USA) linked to a Shimadzu MS TQ8040 (USA) mass selective detector system as previously described.40 Briefly, the system was equipped with a Shimadzu auto-sampler AOC-5000 plus (USA) fitted with a solid phase micro-extraction fibre (SPME) handling system utilising a Supelco (USA) divinyl benzene/carbowax/ polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS). Chromatographic separation was accomplished using a 5% phenyl, 95% dimethylpolysiloxane (30m × 0.25mm id × 0.25um) capillary column (Restek USA). Helium (99.999%) was employed as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 0.79mL/min. The injector temperature was set at 230°C. Sampling utilised a SPME cycle which consisted of an agitation phase at 500rpm for a period of 5sec. The fibre was exposed to the sample for 10min to allow for absorption and then desorbed in the injection port for 1min at 250°C. The initial column temperature was held at 30°C for 2min, increased to 140°C for 5 min, then increased to 270°C over a period of 3mins and held at that temperature for the duration of the analysis. The GC-MS interface was maintained at 200°C with no signal acquired for a min after injection in split-less mode. The mass spectrometer was operated in the electron ionisation mode at 70eV. The analytes were then recorded in total ion count (TIC) mode. The TIC was acquired after a min and for duration of 45mins utilising a mass range of 45 - 450m/z.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. One way ANOVA was used to calculate statistical significance between control and treated groups with a P value < 0.01 considered to be statistically significant.
Table 1: Therapeutic uses, selected disease models and the drug targets that K. senegalensis extracts have been studied against.
Liquid extraction yields and qualitative phytochemical screening
Extraction of 1g of dried plant material with various solvents yielded dried plant extracts ranging from approximately 47mg to 233mg (Table 2). The methanol and the SFE extracts had the highest yields of dried extracted material (233 and 188mg, respectively). Water, ethyl acetate, chloroform and hexane extracted lower masses (approximately 130, 47, 63, and 57mg, respectively). The dried extracts were resuspended in 10mL of deionised water (containing 1% DMSO) resulting in the extract concentrations shown in Table 2. Phytochemical studies (Table 2) showed that the methanol, water and the SFE extracts contained the widest range and largest amount of phytochemicals in this study. Each of these contained high levels of total phenolics and moderate to high levels of saponins, triterpenoids and tannins. Similar classes of phytochemicals were detected in the ethyl acetate, chloroform and hexane extracts, albeit generally at lower levels.
Aliquots (10µL) of each extract were tested in the disc diffusion assay against bacterial species associated with the induction of rheumatoid arthritis (Proteus mirabilis, Figure 2a; Proteus vulgaris, Figure 2b), ankylosing spondylitis (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Figure 3), multiple sclerosis (Acinitobacter baylyi, Figure 4a; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Figure 4b) and rheumatic fever (Streptococcus pyogenes, Figure 5). The K. senegalensis bark extracts were potent inhibitors of reference and clinical strains of P. mirabilis (Figure 2a), with zones of inhibition up to approximately 15mm. The methanolic extract was particularly potent, with inhibition zones of 13.0 ± 1.0 and 14.7 ± 1.2 mm against the reference and clinical strains, respectively. The aqueous (9.6 ± 0.6 and 8.8 ± 0.4 mm for the reference and clinical strains respectively) and ethyl acetate (8.9 ± 0.6 and 7.3 ± 0.3mm for the reference and clinical strains, respectively) were also good inhibitors of P. mirabilis growth. The hexane extract also inhibited P. mirabilis growth, although lower efficacy (7.3 ± 0.3mm and 6.7 ± 0.3mm for the reference and clinical strains, respectively) was evident than for the methanolic, aqueous and ethyl acetate extracts. In contrast, the chloroform extract was completely devoid of P. mirabilis growth inhibitory activity. The K. senegalensis bark extracts were similarly potent growth inhibitors against P. vulgaris (Figure 2b). A zone of inhibition of 9.7 ± 0.6mm was recorded for the methanolic extract. Similarly, growth inhibition zones of 7.5 ± 0.5 and 6.7 ± 0.3mm were seen for the aqueous and ethyl acetate extracts, respectively. In contrast, both the chloroform and hexane extracts were completely devoid of P. vulgaris growth inhibitory activity.
The subcritical K. senegalensis bark extract was also a good inhibitor of Proteus spp. growth. It was a particularly potent inhibitor of P. vulgaris growth (9.3 ± 0.6mm; Figure 2b). Similarly, although slightly lower growth inhibitory potency was noted against P. mirabilis, with zones of inhibition of 8.3 ± 0.3 and 8.0 mm against P. mirabilis (reference and clinical strains, respectively). The subcritical extract displayed slightly lower efficacy to the small scale laboratory extraction (as judged by zone of inhibition). As Proteus spp. (particularly P. mirabilis) are triggers of rheumatoid arthritis in genetically susceptible people,41,42 these extracts may be useful in the prevention and treatment of this disease.
A similar activity profile was evident for K. pneumoniae growth inhibition (Figure 3). The methanolic extract was the most potent growth inhibitor, with zones of inhibition of 9.3 ± 0.3mm (reference strain) and 8.6 ± 0.3mm (clinical strain). This compares favourably with the ampicillin control (10µg) which had 9.2 ± 0.4 (reference strain) and 8.7 ± 0.3mm (clinical strain) zones of inhibition. The aqueous, ethyl acetate chloroform, hexane and subcritical extracts also inhibited K. pneumoniae growth, albeit with lower efficacy (6.7 to 7.5mm zones of inhibition). As K. pneumoniae can trigger ankylosing spondylitis in genetically susceptible individuals,43 these extracts have potential in the prevention and treatment of this disease.
The K. senegalensis bark extracts were also screened for growth inhibitory activity against bacterial triggers of multiple sclerosis (Acinitobacter baylyi, Figure 4a; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Figure 4b),44,45 The ethyl acetate extract was the most potent A. baylyi growth inhibitor, with zones of inhibition of 12.0 ± 1.0 and 15.7 ± 1.3mm against the reference and clinical isolate strains, respectively. Potent growth inhibition was also determined for the methanolic extract (9.0 ± 1.0 and 10.7 ± 1.2mm for the reference and clinical isolate strains, respectively), hexane (8.3 ± 0.3 and 9.0mm for the reference and clinical isolate strains, respectively) and SFE extracts (9.5 ± 0.5 and 10.0 ± 1.0mm for the reference and clinical isolate strains, respectively). These results compare favourably to the ampicillin control (8.6 ± 0.3mm zones of inhibition against both A. baylyi strains). Although smaller inhibition zones (generally 7-8mm) were measured for the aqueous and chloroform extracts, these extracts were still deemed to be good A. baylyi growth inhibitors.
Table 2: The mass of dried extracted material, the concentration after resuspension in deionised water and qualitative phytochemical screenings of the K. senegalensis bark extracts.
+++ indicates a large response; ++ indicates a moderate response; + indicates a minor response; - indicates no response in the assay. M = methanolic extract; W = aqueous extract; E = ethyl acetate extract; C = chloroform extract; H = hexane extract; SC= subcritical extract.
Table 3: Minimum bacterial growth inhibitory concentration (μg/mL) of the K. senegalensis bark extracts, Giardia and carcinoma anti-proliferative IC50 values (μg/mL) and LC50 values (μg/ mL) in the Artemia franciscana nauplii bioassay.
Numbers indicate the mean MIC, IC50 and LC50 values of triplicate determinations. - indicates no inhibition. CND indicates that an IC50 or LC50 value could not be determined as inhibition or mortality did not exceed 50% at any concentration tested. NT = not tested; M = methanolic extract; W = aqueous extract; E = ethyl acetate extract; C = chloroform extract; H = hexane extract; SC = subcritical extract; Met = metronidazole; Cis = cisplatin.
The methanolic (zones of inhibition of 14.6 ± 1.3 and 17.3 ± 1.2mm against the reference and clinical isolate strains, respectively) and chloroform K. senegalensis extracts (zones of inhibition of 12.0 ± 1.0 and 18.0± 1.0mm against the reference and clinical isolate strains, respectively) were also potent inhibitors of P. aeruginosa growth (Figure 4b). The ethyl acetate extract was a similarly potent growth inhibitor against the clinical strain (10.3 ± 0.6mm). However, it was a substantially less potent against the reference strain (8.3 ± 0.3mm), although these results are still indicative of strong growth inhibition. Whilst less potent, the aqueous, hexane and SFE extracts were also good P. aeruginosa growth inhibitors, with zones of inhibition generally 6.7-8.3mm. The P. aeruginosa growth inhibition was particularly noteworthy as both the reference and clinical P. aeruginosa strains are antibiotic resistant strains. Indeed, the 10µg ampicillin control used in our studies only produced 6.2 ± 0.4 and 5.5 ± 0.3mm zones of inhibition for the reference and clinical strains, respectively. This finding is supported by previous studies which have also reported these strains to be antibiotic resistant.24,47 Thus, the K. senegalensis extracts are particularly potent growth inhibitors and may be useful for the inhibition of P. aeruginosa growth. Therefore, as both A. baylyi and P. aeruginosa can trigger multiple sclerosis in genetically susceptible individuals,44 these extracts have potential in the prevention and treatment of this disease.
The K. senegalensis methanolic, aqueous and SFE extracts also inhibited Streptococcus pyogenes growth (Figure 5), albeit with zones of inhibition that indicate only moderate inhibitory activity. The aqueous leaf extract was the most potent growth inhibitor, with an inhibition zone of 7.3 ± 0.3mm, whilst both the methanolic and subcritical extracts gave inhibition zones substantially <7mm. However, this would be considered to be only moderate inhibition and is substantially less potent than the ampicillin control (8.3 ± 0.3mm zones of inhibition). In contrast, the ethyl acetate, chloroform and hexane extracts were completely devoid of inhibitory activity. S. pyogenes has been implicated in a number of diseases including rheumatic fever. Thus, the K. senegalensis methanolic, aqueous and subcritical extracts have some potential in the prevention and treatment of these diseases.
The relative level of antimicrobial activity was further evaluated by determining the MIC values (Table 3) for each extract against the bacterial species which were shown to be susceptible by disc diffusion assays. Most of the extracts were effective at inhibiting microbial growth at low concentrations, with many MIC values against the bacterial species that they inhibited generally < 1000µg/mL (<10µg impregnated in the disc), indicating the potent antimicrobial activity of these extracts. These MIC values compare favourably with the dosages of the pure standard ampicillin which was tested using 10µg per disc. The methanol, water and SFE extracts were particularly potent with MIC values in the range 160-500µg/ml against several species. Indeed, MIC values of 185µg/mL (approximately 1.9mg in the disc; P. mirabilis reference strain), 167µg/mL (approximately 1.7mg in the disc; K. pneumoniae reference strain) and 212µg/mL (approximately 2.2mg in the disc; A. baylyi clinical strain), were determined for the methanolic extract. Similarly potencies were evident for the aqueous and SFE extracts. Whilst the ethyl acetate, chloroform and hexane extracts also had broad spectrum inhibitory activity against many of the bacterial species, they generally had much lower efficacies (with some MIC values >2000µg/ml).
K. senegalensis bark extracts were screened for their ability to inhibit Giardia duodenalis growth (Figure 6). The methanol, water, ethyl acetate and SFE extracts displayed significant inhibitory activity. The methanolic and SFE extracts were particularly potent, inhibiting 95% and 100% of the Giardial growth, respectively (compared to the untreated control). The chloroform and hexane extracts were ineffective as proliferation inhibitors, with no significant difference to the untreated control levels.
The K. senegalensis extracts were further tested over a range of concentrations to determine the IC50 values (Table 3) for each extract against G. duodenalis. Inhibition of trophozoite growth was dose-dependent, with the level of inhibitory activity decreasing at lower concentrations. The methanolic extract and the SFE extract were the most potent anti-proliferative agents, with IC50 values of 184 and 328µg/mL respectively. Whilst the aqueous and ethyl acetate extracts inhibited G. duodenalis proliferation, we were unable to determine IC50 values as the inhibition did not exceed 50% at any concentration tested.
Figure 1: Chemical structures of selected molecules identified K. senegalensis extracts: (a) a characteristic limonoid structure (2-hydroxyseneganolide A is depicted), (b) a characteristic khayanolide structure (1-O-acetylkhayanolide B is depicted), (c) 6-hydroxy-methyl angolensate, (d) a characteristic senegalene triterpenoid structure (senegalene C is depicted), (e) proanthocyanidin B3, (f) fisetinidol-(4α, 6)-catechin.
Figure 2: Antibacterial activity of the K. senegalensis extracts measured as zones of inhibition (mm) against bacterial triggers of rheumatoid arthritis: (a) Proteus mirabilis, (b) Proteus vulgaris. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. Blue bars represent inhibition of the reference bacterial strain. Green bars represent inhibition of the clinical bacterial strain. AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; Amp = ampicillin control (10µg).
Figure 3: Antibacterial activity of K. senegalensis extracts measured as zones of inhibition (mm) against a bacterial trigger of ankylosing spondylitis (Klebsiella pneumoniae). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. Blue bars represent inhibition of the reference bacterial strain. Green bars represent inhibition of the clinical bacterial strain. AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; Amp = ampicillin control (10µg).
Figure 4: Antibacterial activity of K. senegalensis extracts measured as zones of inhibition (mm) against a bacterial trigger of multiple sclerosis: (a) Acinito bacter baylyi, (b) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. Blue bars represent inhibition of the reference bacterial strain. Green bars represent inhibition of the clinical bacterial strain. AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; Amp = ampicillin control (10µg).
Table 4: Qualitative headspace GC-MS analysis of the SFE K. senegalensis bark extract, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds.
The % area is expressed as a % of the total area under all chromatographic peaks.
Inhibition of cancer cell proliferation
The K. senegalensis extracts were tested against 2 cancer cell lines (Caco-2 colorectal carcinoma cells, Figure 7; HeLa cervical cancer cells, Figure 8) to determine their ability to inhibit cancer cell growth. The methanol, water and SFE extracts displayed potent inhibitory activity against Caco-2 cells (Figure 7). Indeed, Caco-2 cellular proliferation was inhibited to approximately 4% of the untreated control cell growth by the methanolic and subcritical extracts (Figure 7). The aqueous extracts were also effective at inhibiting Caco-2 proliferation (to approximately 55% of untreated cell proliferation). In contrast, the ethyl acetate, chloroform and hexane extracts did not significantly affect Caco-2 cell proliferation. Inhibition of proliferation by the methanol, water and subcritical extracts was dose dependent, with the level of inhibitory activity decreasing at lower concentrations.
Figure 5: Antibacterial activity of K. senegalensis extracts measured as zones of inhibition (mm) against a bacterial trigger of rheumatic fever (Streptococcus pyogenes). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; Amp = ampicillin control (10µg).
Figure 6: Inhibitory activity of K. senegalensis extracts against Giardia duodenalis trophozoites measured as a percentage the untreated control. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. * indicates results that are significantly different to the untreated control (p<0.01). AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; NC = negative control; PC = metronidazole control (50µg/mL).
Figure 7: Anti-proliferative activity of K. senegalensis extracts and untreated controls against Caco-2 carcinoma cells measured as percentages of the untreated control cells. Results are expressed as mean percentages ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. * indicates results that are significantly different to the untreated control (p<0.01). AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; NC = negative control; Cis = cisplatin control (50mg/mL).
Figure 8: Anti-proliferative activity of K. senegalensis extracts and untreated controls against HeLa carcinoma cells measured as percentages of the untreated control cells. Results are expressed as mean percentages ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. * indicates results that are significantly different to the untreated control (p<0.01). AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; NC = negative control; Cis = cisplatin control (50mg/mL).
The K. senegalensis extracts also inhibited the proliferation of HeLa cells (Figure 8), albeit with lower efficacy than was evident with the Caco-2 cells. The SFE K. senegalensis extract was the most potent inhibitor of HeLa cell proliferation, inhibiting to approximately 12% of the untreated control cell growth. In contrast, the methanolic and aqueous extracts inhibited HeLa cell proliferation to approximately 43 and 76% of the untreated control cell growth respectively. Inhibition of proliferation by the methanol extract was dose-dependent, with the level of inhibitory activity decreasing at lower concentrations.
Figure 9: The lethality of K. senegalensis extracts and potassium dichromate (1000µg/mL) and artificial seawater controls towards Artemia franciscana nauplii after 24 hours exposure. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least triplicate determinations. AMM = methanolic extract; AMW = aqueous extract; AME = ethyl acetate extract; AMC = chloroform extract; AMH = hexane extract; AMSC = SFE extract; NC = negative (seawater) control; PC = potassium dichromate control (1000µg/mL).
Figure 10: Head space gas chromatogram of a 0.5µL injection of the K. senegalensis bark SFE extract. The extract was dried and resuspended in methanol. Major phytochemical components are identified in the chromatogram.
The K. senegalensis extracts were further tested over a range of concentrations to determine the IC50 values (Table 3) for each extract against Caco-2 and HeLa proliferation. Inhibition of proliferation was dose-dependent for all extracts, with the level of inhibitory activity decreasing at lower concentrations (Table 3). The methanolic and SFE K. senegalensis extracts were particularly potent HeLa anti-proliferative agents, with IC50 values of 155 and 174µg/mL, respectively. These extracts were similarly potent inhibitors of Caco-2 proliferation, with IC50 values calculated of 268 and 470µg/mL, respectively.
Quantification of toxicity
K. senegalensis bark extracts were diluted to 4000µg/mL (to give a bioassay concentration of 2000µg/mL) in artificial seawater for toxicity testing in the Artemia nauplii lethality bioassay. For comparison, the reference toxin potassium dichromate was also tested in the bioassay. Potassium dichromate was rapid in its induction of mortality, with mortality evident within 4 hours of exposure (unpublished results). The K. senegalensis extracts were slower at inducing mortality, with ≥12 hours needed for mortality induction. Despite the slower onset of mortality, the methanol, water and SFE extracts induced mortality significantly above that of the artificial seawater control (Figure 9). Table 3 shows the extract and control toxin concentrations required to achieve 50% mortality (LC50) at various times. All of the extractions also had LC50 values substantially >1000 µg/mL. As toxicity of crude plant extracts has previously been defined as 24 LC50 values <1000µg/mL,37 all of the K. senegalensis extracts were deemed to be non-toxic.
Non-targeted GC-MS headspace analysis of the subcritical K. senegalensis extract
As the SFE K. senegalensis extract had potent bacterial growth inhibitory efficacy, anti-Giardial activity and carcinoma cell anti-proliferative activity (as determined by MIC and IC50; Table 3), it was deemed the most promising extract for further phytochemical analysis. Optimised GC-MS parameters were developed and used to examine the phytochemical composition of this extract. The resultant gas chromatograms are presented in Figure 10. Major peaks were evident in the SFE extract at approximately 14.2, 15.5, 15.9, 16.4, 19.1 and 20.1min. Several smaller peaks were also evident throughout all stages of the chromatogram. In total, 92 unique mass signals were noted for the SFE K. senegalensis extract (Table 4). Putative empirical formulas and identifications were achieved for 72 (78%) of these compounds by comparison with the database.
Plant remedies are becoming increasingly sought after in the treatment of a myriad of diseases and disorders due both to their perception of greater safety than synthetic drugs, and the failure of current drug regimens to effectively treat many diseases. This is especially true for the autoimmune inflammatory diseases. The current treatments utilising disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to alleviate the symptoms of these diseases and/or alter the disease progression are not entirely effective and have been associated with numerous adverse effects.51 Furthermore, many of the current treatments are aimed at treating the symptoms without addressing the underlying causes and pathogenic mechanisms. Therefore, whilst these treatments may alleviate pain, redness, swelling, etc., they do not address the tissue degeneration which occurs as a consequence of the disease etiology. Furthermore, all of these drugs are used as treatments and there are currently no preventative therapy options. A better understanding of the mechanisms for initiation and progression of the autoimmune inflammatory diseases is important for developing new drugs to target specific processes and thus more effectively treat autoimmune inflammatory disease. A major focus of this study was to screen K. senegalensis extracts for the ability to inhibit the growth of bacterial triggers of some autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Our findings support previous studies which have also reported antibacterial properties for K. senegalensis extracts from other plant parts.12,13,16,18 The K. senegalensis bark extracts screened in our study were particularly potent inhibitors of P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris growth, with MIC values of several extracts substantially <500µg/mL. This activity is noteworthy as P. mirabilis has been implicated in urinary tract infections (UTI’s) and the induction of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).41,42 Thus, the K. senegalensis bark extracts have the potential to block RA before the induction of the immune response and Inflammation, thus not only blocking the late phase symptoms, but also the tissue damage associated with RA. Furthermore, as these are crude extracts containing a number of known bioactive components, it is possible that they may also affect other phases of the rheumatoid arthritis disease process (e.g. regulation of cytokine production, immunomodulation, etc.) and thus may have pleuripotent effects. Further studies are required to test the effect of the extract on these other phases of the disease progression. If other therapeutic effects are subsequently detected, the K. senegalensis bark extracts may be a particularly attractive option for chronic sufferers of this disease, to block its onset as well as treating its symptoms once it is initiated.
The K. senegalensis bark extracts were similarly potent inhibitors of K. pneumoniae growth, with MIC values as low as 167µg/mL (methanolic extract against the reference strain), indicating that it may also be useful in the prevention of ankylosing spondylitis. Whilst ankylosing spondylitis affects different tissue than rheumatoid arthritis, it has a similar multiple phased progression.43 The K. senegalensis bark extracts may therefore also have further effects on other phases of ankylosing spondylitis disease. Indeed, it is possible that the extract may also modulate cytokine production and therefore also block later inflammatory disease events, although this has yet to be tested for our extracts. The K. senegalensis bark extracts were also good inhibitors of A. baylyi and P. aeruginosa growth, with MIC values of several extracts <1000µg/mL. These extracts may therefore be useful in the prevention and treatment of multiple sclerosis. Indeed, MIC values of 212 and 659µg/mL were determined for the methanolic extract against clinical strains of A. baylyi and P. aeruginosa, respectively. In contrast, the K. senegalensis extracts were substantially less potent inhibitors of S. pyogenes growth. Indeed, only the methanolic, aqueous and subcritical extracts inhibited S. pyogenes growth to any extent. Furthermore, the MIC values for each of these extracts were substantially >1000µg/mL, indicating moderate inhibitory activity. As S. pyogenes can cause a variety of diseases including streptococcal pharyngitis, impetigo and rheumatic heart disease, depending on which tissue it infects, these extracts may be useful in the treatment and prevention of these diseases.
Noteably, the therapeutic properties of an extract in the treatment of autoimmune diseases may be of greater efficacy as synergistic actions may exist between various therapeutic mechanisms (antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immune-stimulatory, etc.), providing combined effects on these complex diseases. Thus, whilst the bacterial growth inhibitory studies reported here indicate the potential of the K. senegalensis extracts in the treatment and prevention of these autoimmune diseases, the activity may be more profound due to combinatorial effects and further studies are required to examine the effects of these extracts on later phases of these diseases. Furthermore, this study has only tested these extracts against some microbial triggers of 4 autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, multiple sclerosis and rheumatic fever). The microbial triggers for several other autoimmune inflammatory disorders are also known. For example, Borrelia burgdorferi is linked with Lyme disease.52 Whilst microbial triggers have also been postulated for lupus, the specific causative agents are yet to be identified. Similarly, members of the Enterobacteriaceae family are associated with Graves’ disease and Kawasaki syndrome. Mycoplasma pneumoniae is associated with several demyelinating diseases53 It would be interesting to extend our studies to also screen for the ability of the extracts to block these microbial triggers of autoimmune diseases.
GC-MS headspace analysis of the SFE K. senegalensis extract detected a number of interesting compounds, including a wide diversity of terpenoids. Monoterpenoids were particularly prevalent, with 2-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (Figure 11a), β-pinene (Figure 11b), terpinolene (Figure 11c), 1,8-cineole (Figure 11d), α-pinene (Figure 11e), pseudolimonene (Figure 11f), linalool oxide (Figure 11g), linalool (Figure 11h), linalool methyl ether (Figure 11i), pinocarveol (Figure 11j), δ-terpineol (Figure 11k), 1-terpinen-4-ol (Figure 11l), α-terpineol (Figure 11m), α-thujenal (Figure 11n), neral (Figure 11o), piperitone (Figure 11p), eugenol (Figure 11q) and methyleugenol (Figure 11r) putatively identified by comparison to a commercial database. Monoterpenes have been reported to exert a wide variety of biological effects including antibacterial, anti-fungal, anti-inflammatory and anti-tumour activities54 and therefore are likely to contribute to the growth inhibitory activity against the bacterial triggers of the autoimmune diseases reported here. Indeed, many of the monoterpenoids putatively identified in our study have been previously reported to have potent broad spectrum antibacterial activity54 Further studies have reported that a wide variety of monoterpenoids inhibit the growth of an extensive panel of pathogenic and food spoilage bacteria.55 Interestingly, several of these monoterpenoids have also been reported to suppress NF-κ B signaling (the major regulator of inflammatory diseases).56-59 Thus, the monoterpenoid components may have a pleuripotent mechanism in blocking the autoimmune inflammatory diseases and relieving its symptoms by acting on both the initiator and downstream inflammatory stages of the disease.
Several sesquiterpenoids were also detected in the SFE K. senegalensis extract. Comparison to a commercial database resulted in putative identification of cycloisolongifol-5-ol (Figure 12a), italicene ether (Figure 12b), α-dehydro-ar-himachalene (Figure 12c), longifolenaldehyde (Figure 12d), globulol (Figure 12e), spathulenol (Figure 12f), ledol (Figure 12g), γ-eudesmol (Figure 12h), guai-1(10)-en-11-ol (Figure 12i), isocalamenediol (Figure 12j), cyperenone (Figure 12k), phthalic acid, diisobutyl ester (Figure 12l) and dibutyl phthalate (Figure 12m). Previous studies have reported bacterial growth inhibitory activities for many sesquiterpenoids against a wide panel of pathogenic bacteria, with MIC values as low as 4µg/mL reported.60-62 Similar compounds were also detected in the SFE K. senegalensis extract. Thus, sesquiterpenoids are also likely to contribute to the growth inhibitory activity determined in our study. Potent growth inhibition of the food/water borne gastrointestinal parasite Giardia duodenalis was also noted for the K. senegalensis bark extracts in our study. Giardial infection (giardiasis) is a re-emerging disease which afflicts large numbers of individuals worldwide, with higher incidence in countries with poorer socio-economic conditions, inadequate sanitary conditions, untreated water supplies and poor diet.48 Whilst generally not fatal, giardiasis results in debilitating symptoms including bloating, diarrhoea, excess gas, loss of appetite, loose and watery stool, stomach cramps and haematuria. Currently, there are only a narrow range of drugs effective against giardiasis, including quinalones and imidazole derivatives. None of these drugs is ideal as they produce unpleasant side effects including nausea, vertigo, vomiting, diarrhoea and hallucinations.33,48 Furthermore, increasing reports of the failure of current treatments to address this disease indicates a developing drug resistance of several Giardia species.48 Recent studies have highlighted the potential of plant medicines and have demonstrated that some plant components are very effective inhibitors of Giardia duodenalis growth with similar potency to the gold standard drug metronidazole.33 Our studies demonstrate that K. senegalensis bark also possesses anti-Giardial activity. Whilst, further studies are required to identify the active component(s), previous studies have identified several similar terpenoids in plants49 and marine sponges50 which inhibit the growth of parasitic protozoans. The former of these studies is of particular note as it correlates trypanocidal activity with similar sesquiterpenoid lactones as those detected in our study.
Figure 11: Monoterpenoid components of the SFE K. senegalensis extract: (a) 2-hydroxy-1,8-cineole, (b) β-pinene, (c) terpinolene, (d) 1,8-cineole, (e) α-pinene, (f) pseudolimonene, (g) linalool oxide, (h) linalool, (i) linalool, methyl ether, (j) pinocarveol, (k) δ-terpineol, (l) 1-terpinen-4-ol, (m) α-terpineol, (n) α-thujenal, (o) neral, (p) piperitone, (q) eugenol, (r) methyleugenol.
Anti-proliferative activity against Caco-2 and HeLa carcinoma cell lines cells was noted for the K. senegalensis bark extracts (especially for the methanolic and SFE extracts), with IC50 values generally 150-500µg/mL. These findings support and extend previous studies examining the anticancer effects of other K. senegalensis extracts against different carcinoma cell lines. K. senegalensis stem bark solvent extracts significantly inhibited the growth of HCT-15, HT-29 and HCA-7 colorectal carcinoma cells.6,14 This inhibition is comparable to the inhibition of the Caco-2 colorectal cells in our study. Furthermore, that study also examined the inhibitory mechanism and determined that the bark extracts had both anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activities. Similarly, the growth of SiHa (cervical cancer cells) was inhibited by K. senegalensis stem bark extracts,13 paralleling the HeLa cervical carcinoma proliferation results reported in our study. The previous study also examined the phytochemistry of the bark extracts and correlated the anti-proliferative activity with limonoids. Interestingly, similar limonoids were not detected in the K. senegalensis bark extracts examined in our study. However, the GC-MS headspace analysis employed for phytochemical characterisation in our studies utilised a 45-450m/z mass range cut of. Thus, larger limonoid triterpenoid molecules would not have been detected under these conditions and may still be present. Our qualitative studies did detect relatively high triterpenoid levels, particularly in the most potent methanolic, aqueous and subcritical extracts. It is therefore likely that these extracts may contain substantial levels of similar limonoids, khayanolides and other triterpenoids as previously reported for the bark extracts.13 Phytochemical isolation and identification studies using different analytical methods are required to confirm this.
Figure 12: Sesquiterpenoid components of the SFE K. senegalensis extract: (a) cycloisolongifol-5-ol, (b) italicene ether, (c) α-dehydro-ar-himachalene, (d) longifolenaldehyde, (e) globulol, (f) spathulenol, (g) ledol, (h) γ-eudesmol, (i) guai-1(10)-en-11-ol, (j) isocalamenediol, (k) cyperenone, (l) phthalic acid, diisobutyl ester, (m) di-butyl phthalate.
Whilst this study provides insight into the phytochemical compositions of the K. senegalensis extracts, it is noteworthy that no single technique will detect and identify all compounds responsible for any therapeutic property in an extract. Our study utilised a GC-MS headspace technique to examine the extracts. This technique was chosen as many previous studies have highlighted the presence of terpenoid components in extracts produced using other K. senegalensis extracts (Table 1; Figure 1). As detection of these volatile, relatively nonpolar compounds is suited to GC-MS headspace analysis, this was deemed to be an appropriate analytical tool for this study. However, these extracts are likely to contain many more polar compounds that were not detected in this study. Thus, further studies using LC-MS analysis are required to further characterise the higher polarity components of the K. senegalensis bark extracts.
The results of this study indicate that the K. senegalensis bark extracts examined in this report are worthy of further study due to their antibacterial and anti-Giardial activities and ability to block cancer cell proliferation. None of the K. senegalensis extracts displayed significant toxicity towards A. franciscana. Indeed, LC50 values substantially in excess of 1000µg/mL were measured for all extracts (extracts with LC50 values >1000 µg/mL in the Artemia franciscana nauplii bioassay are defined as being non-toxic).37 Further evaluation of the antimicrobial and anticancer properties of these extracts is warranted. Likewise, bioactivity driven purification studies are needed to examine the mechanisms of action of the bioactive agents. Whilst the extracts examined in this report have potential as antimicrobial and anticancer agents, caution is needed before they can be applied to medicinal purposes.
The results of this study partially validate the traditional usage of K. senegalensis extracts in multiple traditional African medicinal systems to treat bacterial and protozoal diseases as well as some cancers. Bioactivity driven purifications of the active components and an examination of the mechanisms of action of these agents is warranted.
Financial support for this work was provided by the Environmental Futures research Institute and the School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide; IC50: The concentration required to achieve 50 % effect; LC50: The concentration required to achieve 50 % mortality; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
|1.||Mahomoodally MF. Traditional medicines in Africa: An appraisal of ten potent African medicinal plants. Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013; e617459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/617459. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/617459.|
|2.||Moyo M, Aremu AO, Van Staden J. Medicinal plants: An invaluable, dwindling resource in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2015;174:595-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.04.034; PMid:25929451.|
|3.||Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, et al. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya; http://www.worldagroforestry.org/resources/databases/agroforestree : cited 27 June 2016.|
|4.||Gill LS. Ethnomedical Uses of Plants in Nigeria. University of Benin Press; Benin, Nigeria: 1992.|
|5.||Iwu M. Hankbook of African Medicinal Plants, Pharmacognostical Profile of Selected Medicinal Plants. CRC Press Inc; Boca Raton, USA: 1993.|
|6.||Androulakis XM, Muga SJ, Chen F, et al. Chemoprotective effects of Khaya senegalensis bark extract on human colorectal cancer. Anticancer Researc 2006;26(3B):2397-406.; PMid:16821623.|
|7.||Abdelgaleil SAM, Iwagawa T, Doe M, et al. Antifungal limonoids from the fruits of Khaya senegalensis. Fitoterapia 2004;75(6):566-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2004.06.001; PMid:15351110.|
|8.||Abdelgaleil SAM, Okamura H, Iwagawa T, et al. Khayanolides, rearranged phragmalin limonoid antifeedants from Khaya senegalensis. Tetrahedron. 2001;57(1):119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00994-7.|
|9.||Makut MD, Gyar SD, Pennap GRI, et al. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of the ethanolic and methanolic extracts of the leaf and bark of Khaya senegalensis. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7(9):1216-9.|
|10.||Kubmarawa D, Khan ME, Punah AM, et al. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial efficacy of extracts from Khaya senegalensis against human pathogenic bacteria. African Journal of Biotechnology 2008;7(24):4563-6.|
|11.||Kayser O, Abreu PM. Antileishmania and immunostimulating activities of two dimeric proanthocyanidins from Khaya senegalensis. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2001;39(4):284-8. https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.39.4.284.5921.|
|12.||Kolawole OT, Kolawole SO, Ayankunle AA, et al. Anti-hyperglycemic effect of Khaya senegalensis stem bark aqueous extract in Wistar rats. European Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2012;2(1):66-73. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJMP/2012/934|
|13.||Zhang H, Wang X, Chen F, et al. Anticancer activity of limonoid from Khaya senegalensis. Phytotherapy Research 2007;21(18):731-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2148; PMid:17450502.|
|14.||El Tahir A, Satti GMH, Khalid SA. Antiplasmodial activity of selected Sudanese medicinal plants with emphasis on Maytenus senegalensis (Lam.) Exell. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1999;64(3):227-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00129-9.|
|15.||Umar IA, Ibrahim MA, Fari NA, et al. In-vitro and in–vivo anti-Trtpanosoma evansi activities of extracts from different parts of Khaya senegalensis. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 2010;4(6):91-5|
|16.||Ibrahim MA, Njoku GC, Sallau AB. In vivo activity of stem bark aqueous extract of Khaya senegalensis against Trypanosoma brucei. African Journal of Biotechnology 2008;7(5):661-3.|
|17.||El-Aswad AF, Abdelgaleil SAM, Nakatani M. Feeding deterrant and growth inhibitory properties of limonoids from Khaya senegalensis against the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis. Pest Management Science 2003: 60: 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.818; PMid:14971689.|
|18.||Khalid SA, Friedrichsen GM, Kharazmi A, et al. Limonoids from Khaya senegalensis. Phytochemistry. 1998;49(6):1769-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00284-2.|
|19.||Yuan CM, Zhang Y, Tang GH, et al. Senegalensions A-C. three limonoids from Khaya senegalensis. Chemistry An Asian Journal 2012;7(9):2014-7. https://doi. org/10.1002/asia.201200320; PMid:22733621.|
|20.||Yuan T, Zhang CR, Yang SP, et al. Limonoids and triterpenoids from Khaya senegalensis. Journal of Natural Products. 2010;73(4):669-74. https://doi.org/10.1021/np1000158; PMid:20222670.|
|21.||Zhang H, Tan J, VanDerveer D, et al. Khayanolides from African mahogany Khaya senegalensis (Meliaceae): A revision. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(2):294-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.12.004; PMid:19136128.|
|23.||Cock IE, Kalt FR. GC-MS analysis of a Xanthorrhoea johnsonii leaf extract displaying apparent anaesthetic effects. Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals 2012;3(2):78-88. DOI: 10.4103/2229-5119.102749 https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5119.102749.|
|24.||Vallette L, Rabadeaux C, Sirdaarta J, et al. An upscaled extraction protocol for Tasmannia lanceolata (Poir.) A.C. Sm.: Anti-bacterial, anti-Giardial and anti cancer activity. Pharmacognosy Communications 2016;6(4) DOI: 10.5530/pc.2016|
|25.||Kalt FR, Cock IE. GC-MS analysis of bioactive Petalostigma extracts: Toxicity, antibacterial and antiviral activities. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2014;10(37 Suppl):S37-S48. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1296.127338 https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.127338.|
|26.||Wright MH, Matthews B, Greene AC, et al. Metabolomic profiling of polar Tasmannia lanceolata extracts shown to inhibit Bacillus anthracis growth. Pharmacognosy Communications 2016. In press.|
|27.||Cock IE, Kukkonen L. An examination of the medicinal potential of Scaevola spinescens: Toxicity, antibacterial and antiviral activities. Pharmacognosy Research. 2011;3:85-94. DOI: 10.4103/0974-8490.8195; https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.81955.|
|28.||Vesoul J, Cock IE. The potential of Bunya nut as an antibacterial food agent. Pharmacognosy Communications 2012;2(1):72-9. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2012.1.13 https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2012.1.13.|
|29.||Sautron C, Cock IE. Antimicrobial activity and toxicity of Syzygium australe and Syzygium leuhmanii fruit extracts. Pharmacognosy Communications 2014;4(1):53-60. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2014.1.8. https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2014.1.8.|
|30.||Chikowe G, Mpala L, Cock IE. Antibacterial activity of selected Australian Syzygium species. Pharmacognosy Communications 2013;3(4):77-83.|
|31.||Boyer H, Cock IE. Evaluation of the potential of Macademia integriflora extracts as antibacterial food agents. Pharmacognosy Communications 2013;3(3):53-62. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2013.3.10.|
|32.||Winnett V, Boyer H, Sirdaarta J, et al. The potential of Tasmannia lanceolata as a natural preservative and medicinal agent: Antimicrobial activity and toxicity. Pharmacognosy Communications 2014;2014;4(1):42-52. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2014.1.7 https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2014.1.7.|
|33.||Rayan P, Matthews B, McDonnell PA, et al. Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts as inhibitors of Giardia duodenalis proliferation: a new treatment for giardiasios. Parasitology Research 2015;114(7):2611-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4465-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4465-4.|
|34.||Rayan P, Matthews B, McDonnell PA, et al. Phytochemical analysis of Tasmannia lanceolata extracts which inhibit Giardia duodenalis proliferation. Pharmacognosy Journal 2016:8(3):291-9. DOI: 10.5530/pj.2016.3.19 https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2016.3.19.|
|35.||Jamieson N, Sirdaarta J, Cock IE. The anti-proliferative properties of Australian plants with high antioxidant capacities against cancer cell lines. Pharmacognosy Communications. 2014;4(4):71-82. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2014.4.8|
|36.||Arkhipov A, Sirdaarta J, Rayan P, McDonnell PA, Cock IE. An examination of the antibacterial, antifungal, anti-Giardial and anticancer properties of Kigelia Africana fruit extracts. Phcog Commn. 2014;4(3):62-76. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2014.3.7 https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2014.3.7.|
|37.||Cock IE, Ruebhart DR. Comparison of the brine shrimp nauplii bioassay and the ToxScreen-II Test for the detection of toxicity associated with Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) leaf extract. Pharmacognosy Journal 2009; 1: 98-101.|
|38.||Ruebhart DR, Wickramasinghe W, Cock IE. Protective efficacy of the antioxidants vitamin E and Trolox™ against Microcystis aeruginosa, microcystin-LR and menadione toxicity in Artemia franciscana nauplii. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A. 2009;72(24):1567-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903232459; PMid:20077231.|
|39.||Sirdaarta J, Cock IE. Vitamin E and Trolox™ reduce toxicity of Aloe barbadensis Miller juice in Artemia franciscana nauplii but individually are toxic at high concentrations. Internet Journal of Toxicology 2008;5:(1)|
|40.||Wright MH, Sirdaarta J, Matthews B, et al. Growth inhibitory activity of Kakadu plum extracts against the opportunistic pathogen Clostridium perfringens: New leads in the prevention and treatment of clostridial myonecrosis. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2016;8(2):144-52. DOI: 10.5530/pj.2016.2.8. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2016.2.8.|
|41.||Cock IE, Winnett V, Sirdaarta J, et al. The potential of selected Australian medicinal plants with anti-Proteus activity for the treatment and prevention of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2015;42(Supp1):S190-208. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1296.157734. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.157734.|
|42.||Cock IE. The early stages of rheumatoid arthritis: New targets for the development of combinational drug therapies. OA Arthritis 2014;2(1):5.|
|43.||Cock IE. van Vuuren SF. The potential of selected South African plants with anti-Klebsiella activity for the treatment and prevention of ankylosing spondylitis. Infammopharmacology. 2015;23:21-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10787-014-0222-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-014-0222-z.|
|44.||Ebringer A, Hughes L, Rashid T, et al. Acinetobacter immune response in multiple sclerosis. Etiopathogenetic role and its possible use as a diagnostic marker. JAMA Neurology. 2005;62(1):33-6.|
|45.||Rashid T, Ebringer A. Autoimmunity in rheumatic diseases is induced by microbial infections via cross reactivity or molecular mimicry. Autoimmune Disease 2012; Article ID 539282. DOI: 10.1155/2012/539282. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/539282.|
|46.||Courtney R, Sirdaarta J, Matthews B, et al. Tannin components and inhibitory activity of Kakadu plum leaf extracts against microbial triggers of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Pharmacognosy Journal 2015;7(1):18-31. DOI: 10.5530/pj.2015.7.2. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2015.7.2.|
|47.||Biggs I, Sirdaarta J, White A, et al. GC-MS analysis of frankincense extracts which inhibit the growth of bacterial triggers of selected autoimmune diseases. Pharmacognosy Communications 2015;6(1):10-22. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2016.1.3 https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2016.1.3.|
|48.||Harris JC, Plummer S, Lloyd D. Anti-giardial drugs. App Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;57:614-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100720.|
|49.||Uchiyama N, Matsunaga K, Kiuchi F, et al. Trypanocidal terpenoids from Laurus nobilis L. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2002;50(11):1514-6. https://doi org/10.1248/cpb.50.1514; PMid:12419922.|
|50.||Orhan I, Şener B, Kaiser M, et al. Inhibitory activity of marine sponge-derived natural products against parasitic protozoa. Marine Drugs 2010;8(1):47-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8010047; PMid:20161970 PMCid:PMC2817922|
|51.||Alataha D, Kapral T, Smolen JS. Toxicity profiles of traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:482-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.62.5.482; PMCid:PMC1754550|
|52.||Beermann C, Wunderli-Allenspach H, Groscurth P et al. Lipoproteins from Borrelia burgdorferi applied in liposomes and presented to dendritic cells induce CD8+ T-lymphocytes in vitro. Cell Immunol. 2000;201:124-31. https://doi org/10.1006/cimm.2000.1640; PMid:10831321.|
|53.||Kollef MH, West S, Davis DR, et al. Central and peripheral nervous system demyelination after infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Evidence of an autoimmune process. Southern Med J 1991;84(10):1255-8. https://doi org/10.1097/00007611-199110000-00022.|
|54.||Cock IE. The phytochemistry and chemotherapeutic potential of Tasmannia lanceolata (Tasmanian pepper): A review. Pharmacognosy Communications 2013;3(4):13-25. DOI: 10.5530/pc.2013.4.3|
|55.||Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, et al. Biological effects of essential oils – A review. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2008;46(2):446-75. https://doi org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106; PMid:17996351.|
|56.||Salminen A, Lehtonen M, Suuronen T et al. Terpenoids: Natural inhibitors of NF-κB signalling with anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential. Cell and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008;65(19):2979-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8103-5; PMid:18516495.|
|57.||Lu XG, Zhan LB, Feng BA, et al. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of human gastric cancer implanted in nude mice by d-limonene. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;10(14):2140-4. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i14.2140; PMCid:PMC4572353.|
|58.||Crowell PL. Prevention and therapy of cancer by dietary monoterpenes. Journal of Nutrition. 1999;129(3):775S-877S. PMid:10082788.|
|59.||Zhou JY, Tang FD, Mao GG, et al. Effect of a-pinene on nuclear translocation of NF-kB in THP-1 cells. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 2004;25(4):480-4. PMid:15066217.|
|60.||Huang M, Sanchez-Moreiras AM, Abel C, et al. The major volatile organic compound emitted from Arabidopsis thaliana flowers, the sesquiterpene (E)-β-caryophyllene, is a defense against a bacterial pathogen. New Phytologist. 2012;193(4):997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04001.x; PMid:22187939.|
|61.||Cane DE, Ke N. Epicubenol synthase. Origin of the oxygen atom of a bacterial sesquiterpene alcohol. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2000;10(2):105-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(99)00650-2.|
|62.||Rahman MM, Garvey M, Piddock LJV, et al. Antibacterial terpenes from the oleoresin of Commiphora molmol (Engl.). Phytotherapy Research 2008;22(10):1356-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2501; PMid:18570217.|
HIGHLIGHTS OF PAPER
Methanolic and SFE K. senegalensis extracts were potent inhibitors of Proteus spp. growth (MICs approximately 200µg/mL).
These extracts were also potent inhibitors of K. pneumoniae (MICs 170-400 µg/mL) and A. baylyi (MICs 200-700µg/mL).
The methanolic and SFE extracts were moderate inhibitors of P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes (MICs >1000µg/mL).
The methanolic and SFE extracts were potent inhibitors of Giardia duodenalis proliferation (IC50 187 and 328µg/mL, respectively).
Proliferation of Caco-2 and HeLa carcinoma cells were inhibited by the methanolic and SFE K. senegalensis extracts with IC50 values 150-470µg/mL.
All K. senegalensis bark extracts were non-toxic in the Artemia nauplii assay.
Ms Camille Rabadeaux: Is a postdraduate student at School of Biology, Ecole de Biologie Industrielle (EBI), Cergy, France. In 2015, she undertook a research project in Dr Ian Cock’s laboratory in the School of Natural Sciences at Griffith University examining the therapeutic properties of a variety of Australian native plants.
Ms Low Vallette: Is a postdraduate student at School of Biology, Ecole de Biologie Industrielle (EBI), Cergy, France. In 2015, she undertook a research project in Dr Ian Cock’s laboratory in the School of Natural Sciences at Griffith University examining the therapeutic properties of a variety of Australian native plants.
Joseph Sirdaarta: Is currently a PhD student at School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Australia under the supervision of Dr Ian Cock. His research project examinines the anticancer properties of a variety of Australian native plants. He has also undertaken studies into antibacterial, antiprotozoal and anti-inflammatory properties of natural and traditional medicines, resulting in over 20 publications and 15 conference presentations.
Dr Ian Cock: Leads a research team in the Environmental Futures Research Institute and the School of Natural Sciences at Griffith University, Australia. His research involves bioactivity and phytochemical studies into a variety of plant species of both Australian and international origin, including Aloe vera, South Asian and South American tropical fruits, as well as Australia plants including Scaevola spinescens, Pittosporum phylliraeoides, Terminalia ferdinandiana (Kakadu plum), Australian Acacias, Syzygiums, Petalostigmas and Xanthorrhoea johnsonii (grass trees). This range of projects has resulted in nearly 200 publications in a variety of peer reviewed journals.