Study of Health Profile of Children Placed in Remand Home

Prabhakar, Balasaheb, Devdatta, and Mangulikar Suresh: Study of Health Profile of Children Placed in Remand Home



Children are greatest national asset and resource. Children should be allowed and provided opportunity to grow up to become healthy, skilful and robust citizens for the society. They should be provided social justice to serve as an effective tool to curb delinquency in juveniles.1

But in today’s world children are exposed to mental pressures both in rural and urban areas due to parental illiteracy, ignorance, competitions in various fields, extreme poverty or affluence, losing morals in adult populations and to variety of sources of information which they can easily access and which is at times beyond their scope of understanding and reason. So, it’s our responsibility to mould and shape their present conditions in the best possible way because children have a right to grow up in a nutritious environment, only then can they realize their full potential. According to the Indian constitution there should be separate jails for the juvenile prisoners or under-trials. They are Observation Homes formerly known as Remand Homes. It is essential to know the condition of children in Remand homes. Although physical and psychological status of children plays a very important role in behaviour of children and thereby development of delinquency, there are fewer studies available in the literature on this topic So, this study is directed to know the Health profile of children placed in a Remand Home.


It was a descriptive cross sectional study carried out in a Government run Remand home for children in the age groups of 6-18 years. There were two types of children admitted under remand home viz. Children in need of care and protection (CNCP) and children in conflict with law (CICL) taken care by Child Welfare Committee (CWC) and Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) respectively. CNCP included orphans, street children, those whose parents had financial problems, those with single parents etc. CICL include those who engaged in deviant or criminal behaviour.

A pilot study was done on 30 children to find out prevalence of psychosocial and health problems among children in remand homes. The prevalence was 13%. The sample size was calculated using the formula n= 3.84pq/l2.2 Using precision level of 5%, at 95% confidence interval and prevalence of 13%, n = (3.84×13×87) / 5 x5 = 173.72

So, the minimum sample size to be collected was 174. So, 200 children admitted during the study period (January 2014 to December 2014) were taken for the study.

The following exclusion criteria were used-

  1. Children who were not willing to participate in the study.

  2. Children whose history could not be taken because of some inevitable problems like no permission could be taken.

  3. Readmissions in remand home.

The data collection was done at the time of admission of child to Remand Home by using Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. If necessary help of the parent, guardian, social worker, police or remand home authorities was taken to know the past history of child if the child was not able to tell. Clinical judgement was also used in examination and scoring. Prior written consent for the study was taken from Child Welfare Committee and Juvenile Justice Board. Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire3,4 was used to assess psychological health profile in children. In this questionnaire, five scales were used to detect any abnormality in the child’s behavioural status. The scales were Emotional symptoms scale, Conduct problem scale, Hyperactivity scale, Peer problem scale and prosocial scale. The children were asked the questions as given in the questionnaire and the response of the child was recorded in terms of score 0-2 and total score in each scale was calculated. On the basis of total score, the child was categorized as with normal, borderline or abnormal behaviour.

Emotional Symptoms Scale0-345-10
Conduct problem scale0-234-10
Hyperactivity scale0-567-10
Peer problem scale0-234-10
Prosocial scale6-1050-4

The behavioural problems were assessed by classifying the children in five groups5 viz. antisocial problems, habit disorders, personality disorders, psychosomatic complaints and educational difficulties. The children were asked questions regarding the specific disorder and then they were categorized in that group according to the answer given by them using the clinical judgement. Only those who were found to have behavioural problems were included in the calculation and remaining were assumed as normal. Health and nutritional status of the children was assessed at the time of admission if the child had any sign or symptom of any morbidity then he/she was included in the category “morbidity present”. The weight and height of the children were taken and children were categorized as normal (-2SD to +2SD of height and weight), underweight (< -2SD weight for age) and stunted (< -2SD height for age) according to centre for disease control (CDC) growth charts.6,7 The children who were underweight and/ or stunted were included in the category of ‘malnutrition’. General and systemic examination of children was done clinically for signs of any other morbidity.


The present study was done in remand home on total 200 children which included both delinquents and non- delinquents.

Figure 1 shows the distribution of children according to psychosocial problems responsible for admission in remand home. More children were admitted for reasons such as conflict with law (39%) and financial constraints (25%). Other causes were orphans, ran away from home, street children etc.

Figure 1:

Distribution of children according to psychosocial problem responsible for admission to remand home.
Figure 2:

Distribution of children according to age and gender.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of children according to age and gender. Percentage of boys was more than girls and more number of children belonged to age group of 12-18 yrs.

It was found that, according to emotional symptom scale maximum, 150 (75%) children were normal and 40 (20%) children were abnormal. 60%, 60% and 65% of children with normal, borderline and abnormal score respectively on emotional symptom scale were Non-delinquents. The difference was statistically not significant (P>0.05). According to Conduct problem scale maximum, 119 (59.50%) children were normal and 61 (30.50%) children were abnormal. Among children with abnormal score maximum i.e. 46 (75.41%) were delinquents and maximum i.e. 93 (78.15%) children with normal score were Non-delinquents. The difference was statistically highly significant (P<0.001) using chi square test. According to Prosocial scale maximum, 121 (60.50%) children were normal and 59 (29.50%) children were abnormal. Among children with borderline score maximum i.e. 11 (55.00%) were delinquents and among children with normal score maximum i.e. 76 (62.81%) children were non-delinquents. But the difference was statistically not significant (P>0.05). According to Hyperactivity scale, maximum i.e. 188 (94.00%) children were normal. Among children with borderline score maximum i.e. 04 (66.67%) were delinquents and among children with abnormal score maximum i.e. 04 (66.67%) children were non-delinquents. The difference was statistically not significant (P>0.05). As per Peer problem scale maximum, 143 (71.50%) children were normal and 23 (11.50%) children were abnormal. Among children with abnormal score maximum i.e. 12 (52.17%) children were delinquents and among children with Borderline score maximum i.e. 24 (70.59%) children were Non-delinquents. The difference was statistically not significant (P>0.05) using chi square test.

Figure 3:

Distribution of children according to type of behavioural problems
Figure 4:

Distribution of children according to type of morbidity
Table 1:

Gender-wise prevalence of morbidity among children in Remand Home

MorbidityBoys(%)Girls (%)Total (%)
Present104 (78.20%)29 (21.80%)133 (66.50%)
Absent40 (59.70%)27 (40.30%)67 (33.50%)
Total144 (72.00%)56 (28.00%)200 (100%)
Table 2:

Relationship between morbidity among children and delinquency

MorbidityDelinquents (%)Non-delinquents (%)Total (%)
Present48 (36.09%)85 (63.91%)133 (66.50%)
Absent30 (44.78%)37 (55.22%)67 (33.50%)
Total78 (39.00%)122 (61.00%)200 (100%)

[X2= 1.41, d.f. = 1, P>0.05; Not Significant]

Behavioural problems were seen in 50% of children admitted in remand home. Delinquent children were significantly more among children with behavioural problems (56.00%), as compared to children without behavioural problems (22.00%). The association of behavioural problems and delinquency was statistically highly significant (P<0.001).

[Note - Even if a single category of behavioural problems (among the five mentioned below), is present in a child, he/she was considered to have the problem in this study and is included in the group of ‘present’]

Figure 3 shows that behavioural problems like antisocial problems, psychosomatic disorders, personality disorders and habit disorders were seen more in delinquents and educational difficulties were more in non-delinquents.

Table 1 shows that out of total 200 children in remand home, 133 (66.50%) children suffered from 1 or more morbidity. Morbidity was more in boys i.e. 104 (78.20%) than in girls 29 (21.80%). The difference was found to be statistically significant (P<0.05).

Table 2 shows that amongst 133 children with morbidity, maximum i.e. 85 (63.91%) were non-delinquents. The association of morbidity and reason for admission was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Figure 4 shows the distribution of children according to type of physical morbidity. 41.44% children suffered from malnutrition and 23.87% children suffered from anemia. Other morbidities observed were dental caries, ENT problems, opthalmic problems etc.


On the basis of results, it seems that delinquents suffer from more behavioural problems than non-delinquents. Although the results range from normal to borderline, even the non-delinquents do suffer from some amount of behavioural problems. The overall prevalence of behavioural problems in children was 50%. This finding is different from the finding of the previous studies because these were from different settings.

Chaturvedi PK, Aggarwal AK et al8 1984, in their article of psychological study of inmates of a children’s home with special reference to their intelligence and aggressive behaviour found that out of 62 children, 19 did not manifest any psychiatric problem during the period of study, while 69.4% of these inmates had one or the other psychiatric problem. In a study conducted by Ahmad A. et al9 on 390 male adolescents in a school at Aligarh, the prevalence of psychosocial problems was 17.9%. The most common problem was educational difficulties found in 17.4% children, followed by substance abuse in 13.3% and conduct disorders in 9.2%. The difference in findings can be due to different criteria used for diagnosis of behavioural problems also due to difference in population pool from which children were admitted in remand homes.

In the present study, 133 (66.50%) children suffered from 1 or more morbidity. Most common morbidity found was malnutrition i.e. in 41.44% of children. Dental caries was found in 8.56% of children. The high percentage of morbidities in children can be due to the poor socio-economic status from which they come. Their familial background, social customs, educational and professional status of parents etc. are some of the other factors which also play an important role.

Bhola P, Kapur M10 2003 identified 23 school-based studies conducted over a period from 1978 to 2002. The total prevalence rates of morbidities ranged from 3.23% to 36.50%. The most prevalent disorders include enuresis, mental retardation and externalizing disorders such as conduct disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.’ Similar to this study, Chhabra P, Garg S 199611 studied 192 boys in the age group 6 to 12 years, living in a Children Observation Home in Delhi. BMI was used to grade the nutritional status according to which, 36.7% of the boys were found to be malnourished. Gaur A, Sujan SG12 2015, conducted a cross-sectional study in juvenile. Juvenile home boys had a caries prevalence of (54.5%) and girls (50.7%), whereas among the school group the boys had a higher caries prevalence of (64.34%) and girls (59.04%). Thus, overall range of morbidities among children is similar to the studies done in past. Common morbidities remain the same – malnutrition and dental caries.


It can be concluded that, although the psychological and physical profile of children differs in various studies done previously, among the children admitted in remand home, delinquent children and boys have higher prevalence of psychological problems and physical morbidities. It can be attributed to numerous biological and social factors affecting their growth and development, such as – gender of child, organic causes, child-parent relationship, marital status of parents, education and occupation of parents, history of addiction in parents etc. Such problems should be addressed while taking care of children in remand home. Usually these problems are overlooked and only placement of children in respective authorities (parents, foster parents, guardians or hostel) is given importance. This will not solve the basic problem of ‘inability of adjustment with the surroundings’. Children should be given due attention, love and care which is their basic right.


Authors are thankful to the remand home authorities, children and their parents for their support and cooperation throughout the study duration.


[2] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



Joshi V, Bharadwaj DN , authors. Juvenile justice in India: a study of legislative policies, judicial trends and social perception. Maharshi Dayanand Univ [Internet]. 2013;[cited on 2014 Mar 10]. Available from:


Vasudevan B, Geeta DM, Bhaskar A, Areekal B, Lucas A, Chintha C , authors. Causes of Divorce: a Descriptive Study From Central Kerala. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;04(20):3418–26


Goodman R, Scott S , authors. Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1999;17–24


Scoring the informat rated Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire [Internet]. [cited on 2013 Dec 22]. Available from: Score Sheet and Instr….


Park K , author. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 23. Role: EditionM/s Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2015. p. 683–4


Weight-for-age charts, 2 to 20 years, selected weight z-scores in kilograms, by sex and age. Centers for disease control and prevention.[Internet]. [cited on 2014 Jan 12]. Available from:


Stature-for-age charts, 2 to 20 years, selected stature z-scores in centimeters, by sex and age. Centers for disease control and prevention.[Internet]. [cited on 2014 Jan 12]. Available from:


Chaturvedi PK, Agarwal AK, Gupta SC , authors. Psychological study of inmates of a childrens home with special reference to their intelligence and aggressive behavior. Indian J Psychiatry [Internet]. 1984;26(2):133–40


Ahmad A, Khalique N, Amir A , authors. Prevalence of Psychosocial Problems Among School Going Male Adolescents. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32(3):21–3


Bhola P, Kapur M , authors. Child and adolescent psychiatric epidemiology in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2003;45(4):208–17


Chhabra P, Garg S, Sharma N, Bansal RD , authors. Health and nutritional status of boys aged 6 to 12 years in a children observation home. Indian J Public Health. 1996;40(4):126–9


Gaur A, Sujan SG, Katna V , authors. The oral health status of institutionalized children that is, Juvenile home and orphanage home run by Gujarat state Government, in Vadodara city with that of normal school children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015;32(3):231–7