Bioactive Propensity of Macroalgae from the Andaman & Nicobar Islands

Sivadasan, Pitchiah, Nambali Valsalan, and Ramalingam: Bioactive Propensity of Macroalgae from the Andaman & Nicobar Islands

Authors

INTRODUCTION

Marine organisms inhabit in a variety of ecosystems where the ecological processes provide support to sustain the life with adaptive interactions. Studies on ecological interactions of marine organisms and their products have taken momentum in recent years with the growing recognition of their importance due to biomedical potential to promote human welfare. Research and utilization of marine algae also increased markedly in recent years. Totally about 8,950 species (6000 Rhodophyceae, 1750 Phaeophyceae and 1200 Chlorophyceae) of marine algal species are hitherto recorded from the seas and oceans. Out of which only 221 species are utilized commercially. These include 145 species for food and 110 species for phycocolloid production. They form one of the major living renewable resources of the ocean.1 Approximately 841 species of marine algae are found in both the intertidal and deepwater regions of Indian Coast.2 Marine algae have been reported to possess a wide array of bioactive properties3-11 and many species have been isolated with antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, cytotoxic and antioxidant properties. More than 2400 marine natural products have been reported from the subtropical and tropical populations of seaweeds.12-13 Biologically active compounds in algal extract are polysaccharides, proteins, pigments, polyphenols etc.14 Sulfated polysaccharides inhibit activity of many bacterial species as well as viruses.15 Laminarin, a polysaccharides found in brown algae can act as a prebiotic and it has also antiviral and antibacterial properties.16 Many macroalgae were widely studied for their antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria6,17-21 and still the investigations are going on. A number of studies have demonstrated the cytotoxic activity of macroalgal secondary metabolites from different geographical region.22-26 The brine shrimp cytotoxic assay is very useful for the isolation of biogenic compounds from plant extracts27 and it is considered as a convenient probe for preliminary assessment of toxicity. Antifouling nature of macroalgae has also been studied widely and reports suggest that most of the marine macroalgae are potential source of antifouling compounds.5,8,28 Hence, the present study was aimed to screen the bioactive potentials including antimicrobial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic activity of macroalgae from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of algae and extract preparation

The marine macroalgae belonging to Chlorophyceae (Caulerpa scalpeliformis, Dictyosphaeria cavernosa and Codium sp.), Phaeophyceae (Sargassum ilicifolium, Sargassum sp. and Padina tetrastromatica) and Rhodophyceae (Amphiro anceps, Actinotrichia fragilis and Gracilaria sp.) were collected from Wandoor (11°35′44.56″N; 92°36′26.63″E), North Bay (11°42′30.80″N; 92°44′44.42″E), Science centre (11°39′15.76″N; 92°45′25.96″E) Carbyn’s cove (11°38′28.65″N; 92°44′48.93″E) and Shastri Nagar (6°48′8.65″N; 93°53′20.69″E) of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The collected algae were cleaned with fresh water to remove the epiphytes and other extraneous matters and shade dried. The dried algae were ground to fine powder using a blender and mixed with solvents such as methanol (MeOH), ethyl acetate (EtoAc), butanol (BuOH) and water (H2O) and kept for 48 hours at room temperature. The solvent mixture was filtered with Whatman No.1 filter paper and concentrated in a rotary vacuum evaporator (Buchi, Germany) at 40°C under reduced pressure. The residual extract was lyophilised and preserved at 4°C until further analysis.

Antibacterial assay

The antibacterial assay was performed by the disc diffusion method against 12 human pathogens viz., Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 3160), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 424), Proteus mirabilis (MTCC 1429), Vibrio cholerae (MTCC 3905), Escherichia coli (MTCC 443), Shigella flexneri (MTCC 1457), Micrococcus luteus (MTCC 106), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 2616), Streptococcus pneumoniae (MTCC 655), Entero coccus faecalis (MTCC 439), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 3384) and Salmonella typhi (MTCC 3216). Briefly, What man No. 1 filter paper disc (5 mm Ø) was impregnated with 200 μg/disc of each extract and placed on Muller Hinton Agar plates (Hi-media, India) pre inoculated with the above human pathogens. The inoculated plates (triplicate) with extract loaded disc were incubated for 24 hrs at 37° C and the discs soaked with respective solvents used as negative control while kanamycin and streptomycin were as positive control under static condition. The assay was carried out in triplicate. The zone of inhibition which appeared around the disc after the completion of incubation period were measured in millimeter and recorded.

Anti-biofilm assay

The anti-biofilm assay was carried out as described by the modified methods of O’Toole and Kolter (1998).29 Briefly, 2 μL of aliquots (5 mg/1mL) of extract were coated to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate and 200 μL Vibrio azureus culture (18 hrs old) added to each well. Along with the test extracts respective solvent and marine broth were also added in separate wells as control. The microtiter plates with test samples were incubated at 28±2°C for 24 hrs. After the incubation, the plates were washed with sterile water to remove planktonic Vibrio cells and the wells were stained with 200 μL of 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min. Finally, 200 μL of ethanol was added to the well to release the stain and the extent of biofilm staining was determined by measuring the absorbance of the resulting solution at 590 nm in a multimode micro plate reader (TECAN M200, Austria). All the assay were carried out in triplicate.

Brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay

The brine shrimp cytotoxic assay was performed using freshly hatched free swimming nauplii of Artemia salina. The assay system was prepared with 2 ml of filtered seawater containing specific concentration of extracts (100 to 600 μg) in a cavity block (embryo cup) with 20 nauplii. The experiment was carried out with test and control (solvent and filtered sea water) for 24 hrs, under constant illumination. The percentage of mortality was recorded after the incubation period and LC50 of the test extract was determined using probit scale method.30

Statistical analysis

A one –way ANOVA test was performed on the cytotoxic activity results to investigate significant differences among the effect of extracts.

RESULTS

The four different solvent extracts prepared individually from nine different macro algae belonging to three classes (Chlorophyceae, Phaeophyceae and Rhodophyceae) showed various degree of activity against human pathogens (Table 1). Of these 36 extracts, 27 showed antimicrobial activity against at least one of the human pathogens. Further, 3 extracts i.e. EtoAc extract of Sargassum ilicifolium, MeOH extract of Sargassum sp. and MeOH extract of Padina tetrastromatica showed antimicrobial effect against 8 pathogenic bacteria. The EtoAc and BuOH extract of Sargassum sp. and EtoAc of Padina tetrastromatica showed inhibition against 7 pathogens (Table 1). Similarly, aqueous extract of Sargassum sp. exhibited inhibition activity against 6 pathogens and MeOH extract of Sargassum ilicifolium and EtoAc extract of Actinotrichia fragilis inhibited 5 pathogens. The BuOH extract of Sargassum ilici folium, BuOH extract of Padina tetrastromatica, EtoAc of Amphiroa anceps and MeOH extract of Actinotrichia fragilis exhibited activity against 4 bacteria. The rest of the active extracts showed activity only against 3 or less than 3 pathogens. Altogether, the highest inhibition zones (5 mm) were exhibited by MeOH extract of Codium sp. and EtOAc fraction Amphiroa anceps against the pathogen Shigella flexneri. However, 9 extracts did not show antimicrobial activity against any of the tested pathogenic bacteria as presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Antibacterial activity of macrolagae from Andaman & Nicobar Islands against human pathogens

Sl. NoSpecies nameSolventsZone of inhibition (mm) in diameter

S.aP.aP.mV.cE.cS.fM.lB.sS.pE.fK.pS.t
1Caulerpa scalpeliformisMeOH0.5----3-0.5----
EtoAc0.5----2.5------
BuOH------------
H2O------------
2Dictyosphaeria cavernosaMeOH------------
EtoAc------------
BuOH----------1-
H2O----------1-
3Codium sp.MeOH1----51-----
EtoAc1----3.51-----
BuOH-----3------
H2O-----10.5-----
4Sargassum ilicifoliumMeOH0.5-1-----223-
EtoAc1-1-311-122-
BuOH2-1.5------21-
H2O------------
5Sargassum sp.MeOH2.522222--21--
EtoAc111110.5--1---
BuOH11.510.511--1---
H2O0.510.511---1---
6Padina tetrastromaticaMeOH--1-2-1210.511
EtoAc--1-1-212-11
BuOH--1---11---1
H2O------------
7Amphiroa ancepsMeOH0.5----4--1---
EtoAc0.5----5--1--0.5
BuOH-----2--0.5---
H2O---0.5-2.5-----0.5
8Actinotrichia fragilisMeOH----2---242-
EtoAc-12-1----21-
BuOH-----------
H2O----0.5-----1-
9Gracilaria sp.MeOH-----10.5-----
EtoAc1----1------
BuOH------------
H2O------------

The antibiofilm activity against Vibrio azureus was analyzed and the results showed that out of the 36 extracts, 14 had inhibitory effect (Figure 1). The percentage of biofilm inhibition was calculated with control (OD value of marine broth with specific solvent), the aqueous extract of Padina tetrastromatica (71.82 %) and BuOH extract of Dictyosphaeria cavernosa (71.58 %) showed higher inhibition. The other 12 extracts, BuOH extract of Sargassum sp. was observed with above 50% of inhibition and aqueous extract of Dictyosphaeria cavernosa (46.66%), Codium sp. (MeOH) (39.07%), Caulerpa scalpeli formis (BuOH) (37.42%), Padina tetrastromatica (MeOH) (28.83%), aqueous extract of Amphiroa anceps (26.41%), Sargassum ilicifolium (BuOH) (24.11%), Codium sp. (18.49 %) (EtoAc), Actinotrichia fragilis (BuOH) (17.01%), Amphiroa anceps (EtoAc) (16.89 %), Amphiroa anceps (MeOH) (14.92 %) and Padina tetrastromatica (BuOH) (10.21%), had inhibitory effect against biofilm formation.

Figure 1

Percentage of antibiofilm activity of active extracts of macroalgae. Data are mean (n = 3) ± SD and percentage of inhibition calculated with the OD values of broth and specific solvent controls.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_1.jpg

The brine shrimp cytotoxic assay results are represented in figure 2 based on the mortality percentage of Artemia salina at different concentrations of extracts. The 50% lethal concentration (LC50 value) was calculated and all the species were evaluated by one way ANOVA with different extracts and concentrations. The highest toxic effect was exhibited by all its four extracts of Actinotrichia fragilis which was highly significant (P<0.01). Among this, aqueous extract showed the lowest LC50 value of 31.7 μg/ml followed by the EtoAc extract, (89.33 μg/ml) (Figure 3). Three extracts of Dictyosphaeria cavernosa (P<0.05) showed LC50 values with less than 200 μg/ml (EtoAc extract -138 μg/ml, MeOH -190.5 μg/ml and BuOH -199.5 μg/ml). Two extracts of Padina tetrastromatica (MeOH and EtoAc) showed LC50 values of 166 μg/ml and 173.8 μg/ml respectively. Similarly, MeOH extract of Caulerpa scalpeliformis (LC50 values 195 μg/ml), Gracilaria sp. (BuOH) (LC50 - 128.9 μg/ml), Codium sp. (LC50 - 129.4 μg/ml) and aqueous extract of Sargassum sp. (LC50 - 195.9 μg/ml) also exhibited LC50 below 200 μg/ml. Among this, the extracts of Caulerpa scalpeliformis (P<0.01) and Sargassum sp. (P<0.01) were significantly inhibited. All extracts of Sargassum ilicifolium and Amphiroa anceps had LC50values with more than 200 μg/ml.

Figure 2

Percentage (Mean ± SE) mortality of brine shrimp larvae against macroalgal extracts after 24 hrs exposure at different concen trations. Sargassum ilicifolium , Actinotrichia fragilis (**P<0.01), Codium sp., Sargassum sp. (**P<0.01), Gracilaria sp., Amphiroa anceps (*P<0.05), Padina tetrastromatica, Caulerpa scalpeliformis (**P<0.01), Dictyosphaeria cavernosa (*P<0.05){* less significant & ** highly significant}.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_3.jpg
Figure 3

LC50 values of different solvent extracts of macroalgae, MeOH-methanol extract, EtoAc- ethyl acetate extract, BuOH- Butanol extract and H2O – aqueous extract of macroalgae on freshly hatched nauplii of Artemia salina.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_2.jpg

DISCUSSION

The bioactive compounds produced by marine macroalgae are mostly used for its self-defence and these molecules have tremendous probabilities for usage in pharmaceutical industry. The present study disclosed the presence of potential bioactive compounds in the screened macroalgae and most of the species have at least one of the bioactive effects, such as antimicrobial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic effect.

The four solvent extracts of all the nine macroalgae displayed different degree of antimicrobial activities against different pathogenic bacteria. Three extracts viz. EtoAc extract of Sargassum ilicifolium, MeOH extract of Sargassum sp., and MeOH extract of Padina tetrastromatica inhibited the eight pathogenic bacteria. The inhibitory effect of the methanol extract of Padina tetrastromatica also reported previously31 and pointed out that the methanol extract (10 μl from 20 mg/1 ml) of P. tetrastromatica with the same concentration of the present study inhibited the growth of six human pathogens such as K. pneumonia, E. aerogens, M. luteus, B. subtilis, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, while reports on ethanol extract (1 ml of aliquots) of P. tetrastromatica showed antibacterial activity against B. subtilis, E.coli, K. pneumoniae, S. typhimuruim S. aureus and P. vulgaris.32

The antibacterial activities of Sargassum species are widely studied and most of the reports are supporting the present study (200 μg / disc). Rizvi33 reported its inhibitory effects of Sargassum ilicifolium (200 μg) against Shigella dysenteriae, while Rebecca et al34 examined 50 μl to 100 μl of 5 gm of powdered sample of Sargassum ilicifolium against human pathogen like Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Klebsiella sp. Antibacterial activity of S.dentifolium and S.hystrix35 against human pathogens and S. latifolium,36 against shrimp pathogens were studied at 50 mg/ml concentration. Devi et al.37 and Seenivasan et al.38 were screened antibacterial effect of S. wightii against human pathogens using 75 and 20 μl of 5 mg crude extracts respectively.

Biofilm formation (microfouling) is the initial step of biofouling followed by the attachment of macrofoulers such as spores of macroalgae and larvae of invertebrates. Marine natural products or extracts with antifouling activities have been isolated from a wide number of seaweeds.7,39-42 Microfouling by bacteria can be prevented by two methods, one by bactericidal activity of natural or synthetic products or by inhibiting the biofilm formation. The bioassay study in the present work revealed that the tested fouling bacteria (Vibrio azureus) is highly sensitive to aqueous extract of P. tetrastromatica and BuOH extract of D. cavernosa (above 70% inhibition) and BuOH extract of Sargassum sp (above 50%). So it is evident that these algae possess better antibiofilm metabolites. The antibiofilm nature of Ulva reticulata, Sargassum wightii and Halimeda macroloba has also been reported.43 Recently, Yuvaraj and Arul44 reported the antibiofilm activity of ten macroalgal extracts among this Sargassum wightii and Hypnea musiformis were prominent in inhibiting biofilm.

Many of the secondary metabolites of macroalgae are well known for their cytotoxic activity. The brine shrimp cytotoxicity test has been used as a bioassay for a variety of toxic substances45 and it is extrapolated for cell-line toxicity and anti-tumour activity as well. The cytotoxic property of plant material is due to the presence of anti-tumour compounds.46 In the present study, the higher cytotoxic profile of all solvent extracts of Actinotrichia fragilis and other macro algae Dictyosphaeria cavernosa and Padina tetrastromatica indicated the presence of high amount of cytotoxic substances. The previous inventions also reported on high cytotoxic profiles of macroalgae like Stoechospermum marginatum, S. swartzii, S. binderi, Spatoglossum asperum, Stokeyia indica and Caulerpara racemosa,46 Acrosiphonia orientali, P. tetrastromatica and G. corticata25 L. brandenii26 and H. musiformis and U. fasciata.23 The Caulerpa sp. is well known for its cytotoxic effect because of compounds like caulerpin and caulerpenyne in Caulerpa cupressoides,47 Caulerpa racemosa48 and Caulerpa taxifolia.49 Fischel et al.50 showed that caulerpenyne caused early and marked shift into S phase followed by a blockage in the G2/M phase in the cell cycle. The comparatively high inhibitory activity shown by the extracts of Caulerpa peltata in this study might be due to the presence of the cytotoxic compounds caulerpenyne or caulerpin and further evaluation is required to confirm this.

The extraction process of bioactive compounds were varied by researchers and the most used solvents are acetone, benzene, butanol,51-52 ethanol,43,53 methanol26 and water.19 In our study an approach was made to analyse the effectiveness of the four solvents (MeOH, EtoAc, BuOH and H2O). MeOH was found to be effective solvent in dissolving the bioactive compounds than other solvents.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed the bioactivity of algae from Andaman & Nicobar Islands and it showed that few species had antimicrobial activity and some algae have antibiofilm as well as cytotoxic effect. Altogether, bioactivity of nine tested macroalgae, Sargassum ilicifolium, Sargassum sp., Padina tetrastromatica and Actinotrichia fragilis have more potent bioactive compounds. Further studies should be undertaken to characterise the active components residing in the algae and to evaluate the effect of each compounds on microbes can be useful for developing ecologically significant bioactive compounds and are effective in biopharmaceuticals.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Earth System Sciences Organization (ESSO), Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) Government of India, to conduct this research. We thank Director, ESSO-National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), MoES, Chennai, India, for his constant encouragement and support to do this work. We are thankful Dr. M. Vijaykumaran, Consultant, ESSO- NIOT, Chennai, for the critical review. We also thank the scientific and supporting staffs of ANCOST, ESSO- NIOT Port Blair, India, for their timely help during this research work.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST No conflict of interest are declared.

ABBREVIATIONS USED

MeOH

methanol

EtoAc

ethyl acetate

BuOH

butanol

H2O

aqueous

LC50

50% lethal concentration

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

REFERENCES

1. 

Sahoo D , auther. Farming the ocean: seaweeds cultivation and utilization. New Delhi: Arawali Books International; 2000. p. 44

2. 

Oza RM , Zaidi SH , authers. A revised checklist of Indian marine algae, Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute. Bhavanagar, India: 2000. p. 296

3. 

Shanmugam M, Mody KH , authers. Heparinoid-active sulphated polysaccharides from marine algae as potential blood anticoagulant agents. Curr Sci. 2000. p. 1672–83

4. 

Yi Z, Yin-Shan C, Hai-Sheng LU , authers. Screening for antibacterial and antifungal activi ties in some marine algae from the Fujian coast of China with three different solvents. Chin J Oceanol Limn. 2001;19(4):327–31

5. 

Hellio C, Berge JP, Beaupoil C, Le Gal Y, Bourgougnon N , authers. Screening of marine algal extracts for anti-settlement activities against microalgae and macroalgae. Biofouling. 2002;18(3):205–15

6. 

Nagayama K, Iwamura Y, Shibata T, eHirayama I, Nakamura T , authers. Bactericidal activity of phlorotannins from the brown alga Ecklonia kurome. Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(6):889–93

7. 

Nylund GM, Pavia H , authers. Inhibitory effects of red algal extracts on larval settlement of the barnacle Balanus improvisus. Mar Biol: 2003;143(5):875–82

8. 

Hellio C, Marechal JP, Veron B, Bremer G, Clare AS, Le Gal Y , authers. Seasonal variation of antifouling activities of marine algae from the Brittany coast (France). Mar Biotechnol. 2004;6(1):67–82

9. 

Tuney I, Cadirci BH, Unal D, Sukatar A , authers. Antimicrobial activities of the extracts of marine algae from the coast of Urla (Izmir, Turkey). Turk J Biol. 2006;30(3):171–5

10. 

Volk RB , auther. Antialgal activity of several cyanobacterial exometabolites. J Appl Phycol. 2006;18(2):145–51

11. 

Taskin E, Ozturk M, Kurt O , authers. Antibacterial activities of some marine algae from the Aegean Sea (Turkey). Afr J Biotechnol. 2007;6(24):2746

12. 

Faulkner DJ , auther. Marine natural products. Nat Prod Rep . 2001;18(1):1–49

13. 

Munro M.H G, Blunt J W, Marinlit , authers. version 10.4. Marine chemical group, University of Canterbury; New Zealand Christchurch : 1999

14. 

Chojnacka K, Saeid A, Witkowska Z, Tuhy Ł , authers. Biologically active compounds in seaweed extracts - the prospects for the application. Open Conference Pro J . 2012;3(1-M4):20–8

15. 

Leonard SG, Sweeney T, Pierce KM, Bahar B, Lynch BP, O’Doherty JV , authers. The effects of supplementing the diet of the sow with seaweed extracts and fish oil on aspects of gastrointestinal health and performance of the weaned piglet. Livestock Science. 2010;134(1):135–8

16. 

O’Doherty JV, Dillon s, Figat S, Callan JJ, Sweeney T , authers. The effects of lactose inclusion and seaweed extract derived from Laminaria spp. on performance, digestibility of diet components and microbial populations in newly weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2010;157(3):173–80

17. 

Salvador N, Garreta AG, Lavelli L, Ribera MA , authers. Antimicrobial activity of Iberian macro algae. Sci Mar. 2007;71(1):101–14

18. 

Kolanjinathan K, Ganesh P, Govindarajan M , authers. Antibacterial activity of ethanol extracts of seaweeds against fish bacterial pathogens. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009;13(3):173–7

19. 

Christabell j, Lipton AP, Aishwarya MS, Sarika AR, Udayakumar A , authers. Antibacterial activity of aqueous extract from selected macroalgae of southwest coast of India. Seaweed Res Utiln. 2011;33(1 & 2):67–75

20. 

Alghazeer R, Whida F, Abduelrhman E, Gammoudi F, Azwai S , authers. Screening of antibacterial activity in marine green, red and brown macroalgae from the western coast of Libya. Nat Sci . 2013;5(1):7–14

21. 

Saritha K, Mani AE, Priyalaxmi M, Patterson J , authers. Antibacterial activity and biochemical constituents of seaweed Ulva lactuca. Global J Pharmacol. 2013;7(3):276–82

22. 

Morimoto T, Nagatsu A, Muratami N, Sakakibara J, Tokuda H, Nishino H, et al. , authers. Antitumor promoting glyceroglycolipids from the green alga, Chlorella vulgaris. Phytochem. 1995;5:1433–7

23. 

Selvin J, Lipton AP , authers. Biopotentials of Ulva fasciata and Hypnea musciformis collected from the peninsular coast of India. J Mar Sci Technol. 2004;12(1):1–6

24. 

Rosa A, Deidda D, Serra A, Deiana M, Dessì MA, Pompei R , authers. Omega-3 fatty acid composition and biological activity of three microalgae species. J Food Agric Environ. 2005;120–4

25. 

Manilal A, Sujith D, Kiran GS, Selvin J, Shakir C, Gandhimathi R, et al , authers. Biopotentials of seaweeds collected from southwest coast of India. J Mar Sci Technol. 2009;17(1):67–73

26. 

Manilal A, Sujith S, Kiran GS, Selvin J, Shakir C , authers. Cytotoxic potentials of red alga, laurencia brandenii collected from the Indian coast. Global J Pharmacol. 2009;3(2):90–4

27. 

Sam TW , auther. Toxicity testing using the brine shrimp: Artemia salina In: S.M. Colegate and R. J. Molyneux (Eds), . Bioactive natural products, detection, isolation and structural determination. CRC press, Boca Rato; p. 442–456

28. 

Bhosale SH, Nagle VL, Jagtap TG , authers. Antifouling potential of some marine organisms from India against species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas. Mar Biotechnol. 2002;4(2):111–8

29. 

O’toole GA, Kolter R , authers. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluores cens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28(3):449–61

30. 

Miller LC, Tainter M , authers. Estimation of the ED50 and Its Error by Means of Logarithmic-Probit Graph Paper. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1944;57(2):261–4

31. 

Kandhasamy M, Arunachalam KD , authers. Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial property of seaweeds of southeast coast of India. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7(12):1958–61

32. 

Ghanthikumar S, Vanila D, Masillamani A, Kanthasamy R , authers. Antibacterial activity of some seaweeds. Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2012;1(1):1–5

33. 

Rizvi MA , auther. Comparative antibacterial activities of seaweed extracts from Karachi coast. Pakistan: J Pharmacol. 2010;27(2):53–7

34. 

Rebecca LJ, Dhanalakshmi V, Chandra S , authers. Antibacterial activity of Sargassum Ilicifolium and Kappaphycus alvarezii. J Chem Pharm Res. 2012;4(1):700–5

35. 

Salem WM, Galal H, Nasr ; El-deen N , authers. Screening for antibacterial activities in some marine algae from the red sea (Hurghada, Egypt). Afr J Microbiol. 2011;5(15):2160–7

36. 

Dashtiannasab A, Kakoolaki S, Sharif Rohani M, Yeganeh V , authers. In vitro effects of Sargassum latifolium (Agardeh, 1948) against selected bacterial pathogens of shrimp. J Fish Sci. 2012;11(4):765–75

37. 

Devi KN, Kumar TA, Dhaneesh KV, Marudhupandi T, Balasubramanian T , authers. Evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant properties from brown seaweed, Sar gassum wightii (greville, 1848) against human bacterial pathogens. Acad Sci. 2012;4(3):143–9

38. 

Seenivasan R, Rekha M, Indu H, Geetha S , authers. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical analysis of selected seaweeds from Mandapam coast. India: J App Pharm Sci. 2012;2(10):159–69

39. 

Bhadury P, Wright PC , authers. Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications. Planta. 2004;219(4):561–78

40. 

Maréchal JP, Culioli G, Hellio C, Thomas-Guyon H, Callow ME, Clare AS, et al AS , authers. Seasonal variation in antifouling activity of crude extracts of the brown alga Bifurcaria bifurcata (Cystoseiraceae) against cyprids of Balanus amphitrite and the marine bacteria Cobetia marina and Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2004;313(1):47–62

41. 

Brock E, Nylund GM, Pavia H , authers. Chemical inhibition of barnacle larval settlement by the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007;337:165–74

42. 

Da Gama BA, Carvalho AG, Weidner K, Soares AR, Coutinho R, Fleury BG, Teixeira VL, Pereira RC , authers. Antifouling activity of natural products from Brazilian seaweeds. Bot Mar. 2008;51(3):191–201

43. 

Prabhakaran S, Rajaram R, Balasubramanian V, Mathivanan K , authers. Antifouling potentials of extracts from seaweeds, seagrasses and mangroves against primary biofilm forming bacteria. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(1):316–22

44. 

Yuvaraj N, Arul V , authers. Preliminary screening of anti-biofilm, anti-larval settlement and cytotoxic potential of seaweeds and seagrasses collected from Pondicherry and Rameshwaram coastal line. India: World J Fish & Marine Sci. 2014;6(2):169–75

45. 

Meyer BN, Ferrigni NR, Putnam JE, Jacobsen LB, Nichols DJ, McLaughlin JL , authers. Brine shrimp: a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta medica. 1982;45(05):31–4

46. 

Ara J, Sultana V, Ehteshamul‐Haque S, Qasim R, Ahmad VU , authers. Cytotoxic activity of marine macro‐algae on Artemia salina (Brine shrimp). Phytother Res. 1999;13(4):304–7

47. 

Vest SE, Dawes CJ, Romero JT , authers. Distribution of caulerpicin and caulerpin in eight species of green algae Caulerpa (caulerpales). Bota Mar. 1983;26(7):313–6

48. 

Paul VJ, Hay ME , authers. Seaweed susceptibility in herbivory-chemical and morphological correlates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1986;33:555–64

49. 

Barbier P, Guise S, Huitorel P, Amade P, Pesando D, Briand C, Peyrot V , authers. Caulerpenyne from Caulerpa taxifolia has an antiproliferative activity on tumor cell line SK-N-SH and modifies the microtubule network. Life Sciences. 2001;70(4):415–29

50. 

Fischel JL, Lemee R, Formento P, Caldani C, Moll JL, Pesando D, Meinesz A, Grelier P, Pietra P, Guerriero A , authers. Cell growth inhibitory effects of caulerpenyne, a sesquiterpenoid from the marine algae Caulerpa taxifolia. Anticancer Res. 1995;15(5B):2155–60

51. 

Vanitha J, Prakash s, Bhimba BV, Lazarus S , authers. Antibacterial action of seaweed against human upper respiratory tract pathogens. Seaweed Res. Utilin: 2003;25:181–7

52. 

Prakash S, Firthous SJ, Bhimba BV , authers. Biomedical potential of seaweed against Otitismedia infected bacterial pathogens. Seaweed Res. Utilin: 2005;27:105–9

53. 

Selvi M, Selvaraj R, Chidambaram A , authers. Screening for antibacterial activity of macro algae. Seaweed Res Utilin. 2001;23:59–63

ABOUT AUTHORS

Sivadasan Deepa is working as Project Scientific Assistant at Andaman Nicobar Centre for Ocean Science and Technology (ANCOST); ESSO-NIOT. She obtained her Ph.D. from the University of Kerala.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_5.jpg

Pitchiah Venkateshwaran serves as Project Scientific Assistant at Andaman Nicobar Centre for Ocean Science and Technology (ANCOST); ESSO-NIOT. He received his master of science in Microbiology from the Manonmanium Sundaranar University.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_6.jpg

Nambali Valsalan Vinithkumar is the Scientist – E and Officer-In-Charge, Andaman Nicobar Centre for Ocean Science and Technology; Earth System Sciences Organizations-National Institute of Ocean Technology (ESSO-NIOT), Port Blair. He is specialised in Marine Bioinformatics, Marine Ecology and Biochemistry.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_7.jpg

Ramalingam Kirubagaran is the Scientist - G and Head of Ocean Science & Technology for Islands Group (Marine Biotechnology Division) of Earth System Sciences Organizations-National Institute of Ocean Technology (ESSO-NIOT), Chennai. He is an eminent scientist in Marine Biotechnology.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-815_img_8.jpg