Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research |Year 2017 | Volume 8 | Issue 3 |Page 78-82
Nuthalapati Rama Kumari1, Ravella Keerthika1, Murki Naveen Kumar1, Jahangeer Basha1, Konda Kumaraswami2, Indukuri Bhaskara Raju3, Vijay Kumar Kutala2
1Departments of Cardiology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, INDIA
2Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, INDIA
3Department of Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, INDIA
Dr. Nuthalapati Rama Kumari
Associate Professor Department of Cardiology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, INDIA
Fax: +9140 – 23310076
E-mail address: email@example.com
Submission Date: 18-02-2016;
Revision Date: 19-05-2016;
Accepted Date: 11-06-2016.
DOI : 10.5530/jcdr.2017.3.19
Background: The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel has been considered as the standard of care in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent evidence supports a role of loss-of-function (LOF) variants in the CYP2C19 as a determinant of clopidogrel response. Carriers of the CYP2C19*2 LOF allele has found to have the reduced pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel and worse clinical outcome as compared with non-carriers in Asian countries including Indian population. However, it is unknown whether the time course of the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel differs according to CYP2C19 genotype in South Indian patients with ACS. Methods: We assessed the platelet reactivity in the early and late phases of ACS according to CYP2C19 genotypes. Eighty six consecutive in-patients who were admitted with ACS at our center were enrolled in the study. The determination of platelet aggregation was done by using a platelet aggregometer and genetic analysis was done by PCR-RFLP method. Results: The numbers of patients carrying the CYP2C19*1/*1 (extensive metabolizer, EM), *1/*2 (Intermediate metabolizer, IM), *2/*2 (poor metabolizer PM), genotypes were 22 (30.9%), 37 (52.1%), 12 (16.9%), respectively. Time course of platelet aggregation from baseline to the late phase among the 3 genotypes indicate that there was statistically significant at 30th day of treatment (p=0.004) between wild versus hetero and homozygous variant alleles. The percentage of patients shifted to prasugrel from clopidogrel due to non-response were 4 (8%), 11(29%), 6 (50%) in wild, heterozygous and homozygous variant alleles. In homozygous group, we found 4 out of 6 patients developed acute stent thrombosis within one week of PCI. Conclusion: We observed that the CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*1/*2 are the major determinants of clopidogrel efficacy. Acute stent thrombosis was observed in patients carrying CYP2C19*2 variant allele
Key words: Antiplatelet therapy, Acute coronary syndrome, Percutanous coronary intervention, Clopidogrel, Pharmacogenetics.
The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel has been widely implicated in the treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1-2 However, it is characterized by high inter-individual variability in clinical response.3 Inadequate dosing of clopidogrel is found to be associated with adverse cardiovascular events, including stent thrombosis after implantation.4-5 Clopidogrel is a pro-drug that must be metabolized by the cytochrome P (CYP) 450 enzyme system to generate active metabolites.6 Metabolic activation by CYP2C19 is crucial for the generation of such metabolites. Several gene variants are associated with the reduced or enhanced CYP2C19 activity.7-9 Furthermore, the allelic frequencies of CYP2C19 variants show significant inter-ethnic differences.10 The allele frequencies of CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3 and CYP2C19*17 have found to be 0.280, 0.065 and 0.010 (rare) for Chinese, 0.310, 0.050 and 0.025 for Malays, and 0.375, 0.010 (rare) and 0.165 for Indians.10 In a study from south India, it was reported the high prevalence (66%) of CYP2C19*2 variant allele.11 In a study from north India, it was shown that allele frequency of CYP2C19*1 and *2 was 0.7 and 0.3 whereas CYP2C19*3 allele was absent in north Indians12 whereas very low frequency was reported in south Indian population (2%).13 This indicates that individuals carrying CYP2C19*2 or *3 or both are more likely to be resistant to clopidogrel. CYP2C19*17 is associated with rapid metabolism of clopidogrel.14 In Indian population the reported frequency CYP2C19*17 are in between 16% - 35.5%.7-10-14,15 Studies have shown that CYP2C19*17 variant is not independently associated with clopidogrel response and observed effect of this variant is due to LD with the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function variant.16
Several cohorts studies have found that patients with the CYP2C19*2 or CYP2C19*3 allele who have undergone PCI are more likely to experience worse clinical outcomes during clopidogrel therapy.17-20 Similarly in a study of acute ischemic stroke, it was also reported that patients with CYP2C19 LOF alleles have a reduced response to clopidogrel and found poorer outcome even up to 6 months after stroke.21 The carriers of a CYP2C19*2 LOF have found to have significantly lower levels of the active metabolite of clopidogrel, diminished platelet inhibition, and a higher rate of major adverse CV events.17-22 In a study by Shalia et al, have observed that poor response to clopidogrel at 24 h with the variant genotypes of CYP2C19*2 as compared to wild type.14 In one study, it has been reported that genetic contribution accounts for only approximately 12% of the response variability to clopidogrel.18 However, it is unknown whether the time course of the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel differs according to CYP2C19*2 phenotype in south Indian patients with ACS. We serially assessed the platelet reactivity in the early and intermediate phases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients according to CYP2C19 genotype.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Eighty six (86) consecutive in-patients who were admitted with acute coronary syndrome at our centre were enrolled in our study. The Institutional Ethical Committee has approved the study and informed consent from each patient was obtained. Out of 86 patients, the data of 71 patients were finally analysed as the genetic analysis data was not available in 15 cases. (Figure 1). Standard definitions of ACS as defined by ACC guidelines were used in the study to include the patients. The baseline demographic and clinical details were recorded in a standard format. Patients with major bleeding events within 7 days before enrolment, hematologic, kidney, liver or malignant disease, or the use of oral anticoagulant agents were excluded from the study. All patients were required to receive aspirin 100 mg/day indefinitely and a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 75 mg/day. Primary PCI was performed immediately after a loading dose of clopidogrel. All coronary angiograms were evaluated by a single cardiologist who was blinded to all other clinical and genetic data. Follow-up visits were conducted at participating centre for one year. Patients who became unable or were unwilling to come to the hospital were contacted by telephone.
Platelet Aggregation Test
The determination of platelet aggregation was done by using a platelet aggregometer (Chronolog) by the turbidimetric method, using 10 μM of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as per the procedure previously described by our group.23 The platelet aggregation test was performed in all the 71 patients at 0 (baseline), 7th and 30th day of treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel.
Genetic analysis of CYP2C19*2 by PCR-RFLP technique
Five ml of venous blood was collected from all the subjects in EDTA vacutainer. Genomic DNA was isolated by salting out procedure. Specific primers were designed for CYP2C19*2 SNP by using primerblast tool. PCR was carried out with forward primer 5’-CAACCAGAGCTTGGCATATTG-3’, Reverse primer 5’CACAAATACGCAAG CAGTCAC-3’ in 10 μL reaction. PCR conditions were followed: Initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, extension at 72°C for 45 sec for 35 cycles followed by final extension at 72°C for 7 min. 300 bp length PCR product was subjected to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) with 1 unit of SmaI (New England Biolabs) enzyme with 3 hr of incubation at 25°C. Products were evaluated on 2% agarose gels stained with Ethidium Bromide. GG (wild) allele gives bands at 187 bp and 113 bp, while hetero (GA) allele gives bands at 300 bp, 187 bp and 113 bp, where mutant (AA) allele lacks restriction site and gives undigested band at 300 bp. PCR -RFLP was carried out with both positive and negative controls, 20% of randomly selected samples were repeated to check reproducibility (Figure 2).
All the patients were monitored for one year after PCI and clinical end-points were noted.
Adverse cardiovascular events were defined as death from cardiovascular causes, spontaneous myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, ischemic stroke, target vessel revascularization, or non-target vessel revascularizations were recorded as primary end-points.
The data are presented as the mean ± SD. Furthermore, the data were compared using one-way ANOVA test. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages and were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed with SPSS 19 software.
The number of patients carrying the CYP2C19*1, *1/*2, *2/*2, genotypes were 22 (30.9%), 37 (52.1%), 12 (16.9%), respectively. The demographic, clinical manifestations and angiographic findings of all patients were stratified according to three genotypes and were shown in Table 1. There was no statistical significance in the demographic, clinical manifestations and angiographic findings among all the genotypes were observed except for the frequency in RCA lesion (p =0.03). Similarly, there were no significant difference in haemoglobin, platelet count and serum creatinine, usage of drugs like aspirin, clopidogrel, calcium channel blocker, statins was observed among all the three genotypes except for beta blockers (p= 0.05) (Table 2).
Platelet reactivity was serially assessed in 71 patients with ACS who underwent stent implantation and received aspirin and clopidogrel. The percentage of platelet aggregation was measured at baseline, 7th and 30th day of aspirin and clopidogrel treatment and results are shown in (Figure 3). Platelet aggregation levels at baseline were not significant among the 3 genotypes i.e., wild allele (CYP2C19*1), heterozygous variant allele (CYP2C19*1/*2), homozygous variant allele (CYP2C19*2) are 53 ± 25, 71 ± 20 and 72 ± 34 percent respectively. The platelet aggregation from baseline to one week among the 3 genotypes indicate that there was no statistically significant difference among all thee genotypes (p=0.12), whereas at 30th day, the platelet aggregation were 16.59 ± 14.98, 32.7 ± 17.46, 31.75 ± 19.79 percent respectively which is statistically significant among the patients carrying wild allele compared to patients carrying heterozygous and homozygous alleles (p=.004).
Figure 1: Flow chart describing the subject recruitment, treatment and analysis.
Figure 2: Representative gel picture of CYP2C19 analysed by PCR-RFLP method.
Lane 1: CYP2C19*/2*2(300 bp); Lane 2: CYP2C19*1/*1(187 bp and 113 bp); Lane 3 & 4: CYP2C19*1/*2 (300bp, 187bp & 113bp); Lane 5: DNA marker, 100bp.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of subjects according to genotype
LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery
Table 2: Clinical laboratory parameters and percentage of subjects on various drugs: Data is Distributed according to genotype
CCB, calcium channel blockers; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor
Figure 3: Platelet aggregation according to CYP2C19* genetic variants. Platelet aggregation test was done at baseline (0 days), 7th day and 30th day of clopidogrel treatment and data was stratified according to CYP2C19*1/*1 (wild, EM), CYP2C19*1/*2 (heterozygous, IM) and CYP2C19*2/*2 (homozygous, PM) (*p=0.04).
Figure 4: Percentage of patients shifted to alternative therapy (Prasugel) in patients carrying, EM (Extensive metabolizer, wild); IM (Intermediate metabolizer, heterozygous); PM (poor metabolizer homozygous).
Clopidogrel resistance is a pharmacodynamics phenomenon where there is no significant change in platelet function after treatment as compared to the baseline. In studies employing light transmittance aggregometry, as in the present study, a change in maximal aggregation ≤10 percent from baseline, using ADP as the agonist, is defined as “resistance.24 In the present study, during the follow up period the percentage of patients shifted to prasugrel from clopidogrel due to non-response were 4 (8%), 11(29%), 6 (50%) in wild, heterozygous and homozygous variant alleles respectively (Figure 4). In homozygous group, we found 4 out of 6 patients developed acute stent thrombosis within one week of PCI.
In this study, the association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy in patients from south India who had undergone PCI was studied. Among the studied subjects, the allelic frequency of CYP2C19*1, *1/*2, *2 were 30.9%, 52.1%, and 16.9% respectively, indicating the higher requency of CYP2C19 1*/2* in patients with ACS. The variant allele frequency of CYP2C19*2 was found to be 35.2% in Eastern India population17 and 37.9% was reported in south Indian Tamilian population.25 In a recent study in Chinese population, the allelic frequency of CYP2C19*2 and *3 are 31.80 and 5.06% respectively.26 Previous studies have shown that the allelic frequency of CYP2C19*2 and *3 in Asian populations are 30%, and 10%27,28 and in Caucasian and African-American populations the allelic frequency of CYP2C19*2 genotype are 13% and 18%27,28 respectively.
Next, we determined whether the effects of the CYP2C19 variants on the ADP-stimulated platelet. Aggregation before, one week and one month of clopidogrel treatment. Patients carrying CYP2C19*1*/2 or CYP2C19*2 variant allele was found to be significantly associated ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation suggesting that the CYP2C19*1*/2 or CYP2C19*2 variant are the main determinant of clopidogrel efficacy. Though not statistically significant, we found decreased baseline platelet aggregation in patients carrying either CYP2C19*1*/2 or CYP2C19*2 variant allele as compared to patients carrying wild allele. The reason for this difference is not known. Even though the CYP2C19*2 and *3 LOF alleles have been reported, the CYP2C19*2 allele is the most common type among the reduced-function genes and has been shown as a prime indicator of low response to clopidogrel in many studies.28,29 Poor metabolizers (CYP2C19*2) with ACS or undergoing PCI intervention treated with clopidogrel at recommended doses exhibit higher cardiovascular event rates than do patients with normal CYP2C19 function7. Similarly, IM (e.g., *1/*2, *1/*3) have higher on-treatment residual platelet activity on average as compared with EM, hence the patients with ACS or undergoing PCI, CYP2C19*1/*2 heterozygotes treated with clopidogrel have increased risks for serious adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including stent thrombosis.7
In the current study, we found that the percentage of patients shifted to prasugrel from clopidogrel due to non-response are 8%, 29%, 50% in wild, heterozygous (IM) and homozygous variant (PM) alleles respectively, indicating that majority of the patients carrying PM or IM phenotypes require shifting of alternative drug since they found to have resistant to clopidogrel. Studies have shown up to 30% of patients on conventional dose of clopidogrel exhibit an inadequate antiplatelet response, otherwise called as clopidogrel resistance.30,31 Patients with laboratory-defined resistance have shown increased risk of atherothrombosis.32,33
In the present study, we observed that in homozygous variant (PM) group, 4 out of 6 patients developed acute stent thrombosis within one week of PCI. In a study by Zhu et al, in Chinese patients showed that the CYP2C19 LOF alleles (*2 and *3) are risk factors for the prognosis of patients who have undergone carotid artery stenting and are on clopidogrel therapy.26 In the same study, they observed that two patients carrying LOF alleles developed stent thrombosis. In a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that the presence of even one reduced function of CYP2C19 allele was associated with a significant increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events particularly stent thrombosis in patients who receive clopidogrel34. Studies have shown that more episodes of stent thrombosis occurred in first 30 days of stent implantation and the results of recent clinical trials suggest that intensive platelet inhibition is prerequisite to prevent cardiovascular events.17-35
Based on our results and findings from the several studies, it is conceivable that genotyping will be beneficial to the patients who are on clopidogrel treatment.36-38 The cost-effectiveness analysis based on the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial have suggested that genotyping patients before selecting antiplatelet treatment could offer more value in the clinical setting than putting on drug therapy without regard to pharmacogenomic test results.36 In another study, Johnson et al, studied the budget analysis to estimate the financial impact of CYP2C19 testing in a cohort of ACS/PCI patients being treated with clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor, and observed the genetic testing is more cost-effective than patients treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor.37 In a recent study by Wang et al, suggested that CYP2C19*2 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy remained a cost-effective approach as compared with the use of generic clopidogrel or ticagrelor in post-PCI ACS patient.38 Based on these evidences, the value of genotyping reflects both fewer adverse events and lower costs to the patients.
There are several limitations in our study. Our study included a relatively small number of patients to evaluate clinical outcomes. The coexistence of other factors influencing clopidogrel induced platelet inhibition such as P2Y12 gene polymorphisms and other CYP2C19 LOF alleles have not been investigated in this study. A larger study involving patients with PCI on clopidogrel treatment, genotyping, monitoring the platelet aggregation testing for 6 to 12 months and study the clinical outcome warrants further investigation.
To conclude, consistence with the other studies, we also observed that the CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*1/*2 are the major determinants of clopidogrel efficacy. The majority of IM and PM have decreased platelet reactivity. Acute stent thrombosis was observed in patients carrying CYP2C19*2 variant allele.
This work was supported by a grant from Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BT/PR7964/MED/12/606/2013).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ACS: acute coronary syndrome; ADP: adenosine diphosphate; EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; EM: extensive metabolizer; IM: intermediate metabolizer; LOF: loss of function; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; PM: poor metabolizer; RCA: right coronary artery; RFLP: restriction fragment length polymorphism.
|1.||Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, et al. Effects of Clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502.|
|2.||Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann III JT, Fry ET, DeLago A, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2002;288(19):2411-20.|
|3.||Tsukahara K, Kimura K, Morita S, Ebina T, Kosuge M, et al. Impact of concomitant use of proton-pump inhibitors and thienopyridine derivatives on the antiplatelet effects. Journal of cardiology. 2011;57(3):275-82.|
|4.||Bliden KP, DiChiara J, Tantry US, Bassi AK, Chaganti SK, et al. Increased risk in patients with high platelet aggregation receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: is the current antiplatelet therapy adequate?. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;49(6):657-66.|
|5.||Buonamici P, Marcucci R, Migliorini A, Gensini GF, Santini A, et al. Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;49(24):2312-7.|
|6.||Kazui M, Nishiya Y, Ishizuka T, Hagihara K, Farid NA, et al. Identification of the human cytochrome p450 enzymes involved in the two oxidative steps in the bioactivation of clopidogrel to its pharmacologically active metabolite. Drug Metab Dispos.2010;38:92-99.|
|7.||Scott S, Sangkuhl K, Gardner EE, Stein CM, Hulot JS, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for cytochrome P450–2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype and clopidogrel therapy. CliniCal pharmaCology & TherapeuTiCs. 2011;90(2):328-32.|
|8.||Price MJ, Tantry US, Gurbel PA. The influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effectiveness of P2Y (12) inhibitors. Reviews in cardiovascular medicine. 2010;12(1):1-2.|
|9.||Yamamoto K, Hokimoto S, Chitose T, Morita K, Ono T, et al. Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism on residual platelet reactivity in patients with coronary heart disease during antiplatelet therapy. Journal of cardiology. 2011;57(2):194-201.|
|10.||Chan MY, Tan K, Tan HC, Huan PT, Li B, et al. CYP2C19 and PON1 polymorphisms regulating clopidogrel bioactivation in Chinese, Malay and Indian subjects. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13(5):533-42.|
|11.||Mahadevan L, Ancy Yesudas PK, Revu S, Kumar P, Santhosh D, et al. Prevalence of genetic variants associated with cardiovascular disease risk and drug response in the Southern Indian population of Kerala. Indian journal of human genetics. 2014;20(2):175.|
|12.||Lamba JK, Dhiman RK, Kohli KK. CYP2C19 genetic mutations in North Indians. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2000;68(3):328-35.|
|13.||Adithan C, Gerard N, Vasu S, Rosemary J, Shashindran CH, et al. Allele and genotype frequency of CYP2C19 in a Tamilian population. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2003;56(3):331-3.|
|14.||Shalia KK, Shah VK, Pawar P, Divekar SS, Payannavar S. Polymorphisms of MDR1, CYP2C19 and P2Y 12 genes in Indian population: Effects on clopidogrel response. Indian heart journal. 2013;65(2):158-67.|
|15.||Shetkar SS, Ramakrishnan S, Seth S, Chandna P, Verma SK, Bhargava B, Bahl VK. CYP 450 2C19 polymorphisms in Indian patients with coronary artery disease. Indian heart journal. 2014;66(1):16-24.|
|16.||Lewis JP, Stephens SH, Horenstein RB, O’connell JR, Ryan K, et al. The CYP2C19* 17 variant is not independently associated with clopidogrel response. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2013;11(9):1640-6.|
|17.||Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, Shen L, Hockett RD, et al. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(4):354-62.|
|18.||Shuldiner AR, O’Connell JR, Bliden KP, Gandhi A, Ryan K, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. Jama. 2009;302(8):849-57.|
|19.||Giusti B, ori AM, Marcucci R, Saracini C, Sestini I, et al. Relation of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism to occurrence of drug-eluting coronary stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:806–11.|
|20.||Sibbing D, Stegherr J, Latz W, Koch W, Mehilli J, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. European heart journal. 2009 Feb 4.|
|21.||Jia DM, Chen ZB, Zhang MJ, Yang WJ, Jin JL, et al. CYP2C19 polymorphisms and antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in acute ischemic stroke in China. Stroke. 2013; 44:1717–9.|
|22.||Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, Quteineh L, Drouet E, et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(4):363-75.|
|23.||Aruna D, Naidu MU. Pharmacodynamic interaction studies of Ginkgo biloba with cilostazol and clopidogrel in healthy human subjects. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2007;63(3):333-8.|
|24.||Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: current status and future research. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2005;6(12):2027-45.|
|25.||Adithan C, Gerard N, Vasu S, Rosemary J, Shashindran CH, et al. Allele and genotype frequency of CYP2C19 in a Tamilian population. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2003;56(3):331-3.|
|26.||Zhu WY, Zhao T, Xiong XY, Li J, Wang L, et al. Association of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms with the Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Therapy in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting in Asia. Sci Rep. 2016;6(25478):1-7.|
|27.||Xie HG, Kim RB, Wood AJ, Stein CM. Molecular basis of ethnic differences in drug disposition and response. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2001;41(1):815-50.|
|28.||Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, Flockhart DA. Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2002;41(12):913-58.|
|29.||Jinnai T, Horiuchi H, Makiyama T, Tazaki J, Tada T, et al. Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in an actual clinical setting in Japan. Circulation Journal. 2009;73(8):1498-503.|
|30.||Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V, Shechter M, Beinart R, et al. Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109(25):3171-5.|
|31.||Snoep JD, Hovens MM, Eikenboom JC, van der Bom JG, Huisman MV. Association of laboratory-defined aspirin resistance with a higher risk of recurrent cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007;167(15):1593-9.|
|32.||Frere C, Cuisset T, Morange PE, Quilici J, Camoin-Jau L, et al. Effect of cytochrome p450 polymorphisms on platelet reactivity after treatment with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome. The American journal of cardiology. 2008;101(8):1088-93.|
|33.||Barragan P, Bouvier JL, Roquebert PO, Macaluso G, Commeau P, et al. Resistance to thienopyridines: Clinical detection of coronary stent thrombosis by monitoring of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular interventions. 2003;59(3):295-302.|
|34.||Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2010;304(16):1821-30.|
|35.||Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, Jolly SS, Joyner CD, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial. The Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1233-43.|
|36.||Reese ES, Daniel Mullins C, Beitelshees AL, Onukwugha E. Cost-Effectiveness of Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotype Screening for Selection of Antiplatelet Therapy with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2012;32(4):323-32.|
|37.||Wang Y, Yan BP, Liew D, Lee VW. Cost-effectiveness of cytochrome P450 2C19* 2 genotype-guided selection of clopidogrel or ticagrelor in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2017 Jan 24.|
|38.||Johnson SG, Gruntowicz D, Chua T, Morlock RJ. Financial analysis of CYP2C19 genotyping in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy. 2015;21(7):552-7.|